[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X9eWf0eGHonxQk5H@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:44:47 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.10
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:02:47AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14 2020 at 12:52am -0500,
> Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:31:47AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 03:03:29PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > > Ok, here it is - 5.10 is tagged and pushed out.
> > > >
> > > > I pretty much always wish that the last week was even calmer than it
> > > > was, and that's true here too. There's a fair amount of fixes in here,
> > > > including a few last-minute reverts for things that didn't get fixed,
> > > > but nothing makes me go "we need another week".
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > Mike Snitzer (1):
> > > > md: change mddev 'chunk_sectors' from int to unsigned
> > >
> > > Seems to be broken. This breaks mounting my raid6 partition:
> > >
> > > [ 87.290698] attempt to access beyond end of device
> > > md0: rw=4096, want=13996467328, limit=6261202944
> > > [ 87.293371] attempt to access beyond end of device
> > > md0: rw=4096, want=13998564480, limit=6261202944
> > > [ 87.296045] BTRFS warning (device md0): couldn't read tree root
> > > [ 87.300056] BTRFS error (device md0): open_ctree failed
> > >
> > > Reverting it goes back to the -rc7 behaviour where it mounts fine.
> >
> > If the developer/maintainer(s) agree, I can revert this and push out a
> > 5.10.1, just let me know.
>
> Yes, these should be reverted from 5.10 via 5.10.1:
>
> e0910c8e4f87 dm raid: fix discard limits for raid1 and raid10
> f075cfb1dc59 md: change mddev 'chunk_sectors' from int to unsigned
>
> They were also both marked for stable@, and I just got email stating
> that you've staged them both for 5.4 and 5.9, but they shouldn't go to
> stable@. We need to reassess and fix during 5.11.
Ok, will go push out a 5.10.1 with those reverted, but please, get the
reverts into Linus as soon as possible as well.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists