[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3827230.0GnL3RTcl1@kreacher>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 21:01:52 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>,
Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] cpufreq: Allow drivers to receive more information from the governor
Hi,
The timing of this is not perfect (sorry about that), but here's a refresh
of this series.
The majority of the previous cover letter still applies:
On Monday, December 7, 2020 5:25:38 PM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> This is based on the RFC posted a few days ago:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/1817571.2o5Kk4Ohv2@kreacher/
>
> Using intel_pstate in the passive mode with HWP enabled, in particular under
> the schedutil governor, is still kind of problematic, because it has to assume
> that it should not allow the frequency to fall below the one requested by the
> governor. For this reason, it translates the target frequency into HWP.REQ.MIN
> which generally causes the processor to run a bit too fast.
>
> Moreover, this allows the HWP algorithm to use any frequency between the target
> one and HWP.REQ.MAX that corresponds to the policy max limit and some workloads
> cause it to go for the max turbo frequency prematurely which hurts energy-
> efficiency without improving performance, even though the schedutil governor
> itself would not allow the frequency to ramp up so fast.
>
> This patch series attempts to improve the situation by introducing a new driver
> callback allowing the driver to receive more information from the governor. In
> particular, this allows the min (required) and target (desired) performance
> levels to be passed to it and those can be used to give better hints to the
> hardware.
In this second revision there are three patches (one preparatory patch for
schedutil that hasn't changed since the v1, the introduction of the new
callback and schedutil changes in patch [2/3] and the intel_pstate changes
in patch [3/3] that are the same as before.
Please see patch changelogs for details.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists