[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0f001a81-b1d3-4df4-28db-b193812a1a42@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 05:45:49 +0100
From: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the parisc-hd tree with the
asm-generic tree
On 12/14/20 8:48 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 12:38:41 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the parisc-hd tree got a conflict in:
>>
>> arch/parisc/kernel/time.c
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>> 686092e7daaa ("parisc: use legacy_timer_tick")
>>
>> from the asm-generic tree and commit:
>>
>> 3b7ab4a74a2d ("parisc: Switch to clockevent based timers")
>>
>> from the parisc-hd tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (I effectively reverted the former commit) and can carry the
>> fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
>> but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
>> maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want
>> to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
>> minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
> This is just a reminder that this conflict still exists.
I dropped the patch from the parisc-hd tree for now -
it needs more work and will not be part of the next merge window.
Thanks,
Helge
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists