[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1608024188.29527.2.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 17:23:08 +0800
From: Hsin-hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
Wen Su <wen.su@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] regulator: mt6359: Add support for MT6359
regulator
Hi,
On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 17:07 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 11:48:07AM +0800, Hsin-Hsiung Wang wrote:
>
> > +static int mt6359_get_linear_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> > +{
> > + struct mt6359_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> > + int ret, regval;
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_read(rdev->regmap, info->da_vsel_reg, ®val);
> > + if (ret != 0) {
> > + dev_err(&rdev->dev,
> > + "Failed to get mt6359 Buck %s vsel reg: %d\n",
> > + info->desc.name, ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = (regval >> info->da_vsel_shift) & info->da_vsel_mask;
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
>
> This looks like it could just be regmap_get_voltage_sel_regmap()?
> Otherwise the driver looks good.
Thanks for the review.
MT6359 regulator has sel_reg and status_reg, so we use
mt6359_get_linear_voltage_sel for status_reg instead of
regmap_get_voltage_sel_regmap() which uses sel_reg.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists