[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <410bf2a27978abb74ba41bc9f9198dcf85636b3c.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:28:02 +0100
From: Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>
To: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
Cc: alim.akhtar@...sung.com, avri.altman@....com,
asutoshd@...eaurora.org, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, beanhuo@...ron.com, bvanassche@....org,
tomas.winkler@...el.com, cang@...eaurora.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] scsi: ufs: Cleanup WB buffer flush toggle
implementation
On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 17:07 +0800, Stanley Chu wrote:
> > if (ret) {
> > - dev_warn(hba->dev, "%s: WB - buf flush disable failed
> > %d\n",
> > - __func__, ret);
> > - } else {
> > - hba->dev_info.wb_buf_flush_enabled = false;
> > - dev_dbg(hba->dev, "WB - Flush disabled: %d\n", ret);
> > + dev_err(hba->dev, "%s WB-Buf Flush %s failed %d\n",
> > __func__,
> > + enable ? "enable" : "disable", ret);
> > + goto out;
> > }
> >
> > + if (enable)
> > + hba->dev_info.wb_buf_flush_enabled = true;
> > + else
> > + hba->dev_info.wb_buf_flush_enabled = false;
>
> Perhaps this could be simpler as below?
>
> hba->dev_info.wb_buf_flush_enabled = enable;
Thanks, will be changed in next version.
Bean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists