| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <6be8d340-248d-3853-8799-4327b76c63ab@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 16:11:42 +0100
From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, alexander.deucher@....com,
airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch, lee.jones@...aro.org,
Felix.Kuehling@....com, nirmoy.das@....com, sonny.jiang@....com,
xinhui.pan@....com, colin.king@...onical.com, James.Zhu@....com,
leo.liu@....com, thong.thai@....com, vegopala@....com,
boyuan.zhang@....com, Monk.Liu@....com, mh12gx2825@...il.com
Cc: amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: remove h from printk format specifier
Am 15.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Tom Rix:
> On 12/15/20 6:47 AM, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 15.12.20 um 15:38 schrieb trix@...hat.com:
>>> From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
>>>
>>> See Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst.
>>> h should no longer be used in the format specifier for printk.
>> In general looks valid to me, but my question is how does that work?
>>
>> I mean we specify h here because it is a short int. Are ints always 32bit on the stack?
> The type of the argument is promoted to int. This was discussed earlier here
>
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Flkml%2Fa68114afb134b8633905f5a25ae7c4e6799ce8f1.camel%40perches.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7C0dd6fe7c17304d4ea72a08d8a10af765%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637436415772411133%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=ta8M5iN%2Bj2J6tio%2FMuUi2lG%2BiyEhkdsFfpXcEjGKNwE%3D&reserved=0
Thanks, I expected this but just wanted to double check.
In this case this patch as well as the radeon one are Reviewed-by:
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> Tom
>
>> Thanks,
>> Christian.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c | 4 ++--
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c | 2 +-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.c | 4 ++--
>>> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c
>>> index 7c5b60e53482..8b989670ed66 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c
>>> @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ int amdgpu_uvd_sw_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>> version_major = (le32_to_cpu(hdr->ucode_version) >> 24) & 0xff;
>>> version_minor = (le32_to_cpu(hdr->ucode_version) >> 8) & 0xff;
>>> - DRM_INFO("Found UVD firmware Version: %hu.%hu Family ID: %hu\n",
>>> + DRM_INFO("Found UVD firmware Version: %u.%u Family ID: %u\n",
>>> version_major, version_minor, family_id);
>>> /*
>>> @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ int amdgpu_uvd_sw_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>> dec_minor = (le32_to_cpu(hdr->ucode_version) >> 8) & 0xff;
>>> enc_minor = (le32_to_cpu(hdr->ucode_version) >> 24) & 0x3f;
>>> enc_major = (le32_to_cpu(hdr->ucode_version) >> 30) & 0x3;
>>> - DRM_INFO("Found UVD firmware ENC: %hu.%hu DEC: .%hu Family ID: %hu\n",
>>> + DRM_INFO("Found UVD firmware ENC: %u.%u DEC: .%u Family ID: %u\n",
>>> enc_major, enc_minor, dec_minor, family_id);
>>> adev->uvd.max_handles = AMDGPU_MAX_UVD_HANDLES;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c
>>> index 4861f8ddc1b5..ea6a62f67e38 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c
>>> @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ int amdgpu_vce_sw_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev, unsigned long size)
>>> version_major = (ucode_version >> 20) & 0xfff;
>>> version_minor = (ucode_version >> 8) & 0xfff;
>>> binary_id = ucode_version & 0xff;
>>> - DRM_INFO("Found VCE firmware Version: %hhd.%hhd Binary ID: %hhd\n",
>>> + DRM_INFO("Found VCE firmware Version: %d.%d Binary ID: %d\n",
>>> version_major, version_minor, binary_id);
>>> adev->vce.fw_version = ((version_major << 24) | (version_minor << 16) |
>>> (binary_id << 8));
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.c
>>> index 1e756186e3f8..99b82f3c2617 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.c
>>> @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ int amdgpu_vcn_sw_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>> enc_major = fw_check;
>>> dec_ver = (le32_to_cpu(hdr->ucode_version) >> 24) & 0xf;
>>> vep = (le32_to_cpu(hdr->ucode_version) >> 28) & 0xf;
>>> - DRM_INFO("Found VCN firmware Version ENC: %hu.%hu DEC: %hu VEP: %hu Revision: %hu\n",
>>> + DRM_INFO("Found VCN firmware Version ENC: %u.%u DEC: %u VEP: %u Revision: %u\n",
>>> enc_major, enc_minor, dec_ver, vep, fw_rev);
>>> } else {
>>> unsigned int version_major, version_minor, family_id;
>>> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ int amdgpu_vcn_sw_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>> family_id = le32_to_cpu(hdr->ucode_version) & 0xff;
>>> version_major = (le32_to_cpu(hdr->ucode_version) >> 24) & 0xff;
>>> version_minor = (le32_to_cpu(hdr->ucode_version) >> 8) & 0xff;
>>> - DRM_INFO("Found VCN firmware Version: %hu.%hu Family ID: %hu\n",
>>> + DRM_INFO("Found VCN firmware Version: %u.%u Family ID: %u\n",
>>> version_major, version_minor, family_id);
>>> }
>>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists