lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5853b349-562c-3b6a-33d6-49516553dad8@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Dec 2020 08:40:06 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: tegra: Fix misplaced tegra_uart_config in
 decompressor



On 12/15/2020 8:17 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 15.12.2020 19:04, Florian Fainelli пишет:
>>
>>
>> On 12/15/2020 5:52 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> The tegra_uart_config of the DEBUG_LL code is now placed right at the
>>> start of the .text section after commit which enabled debug output in the
>>> decompressor. Tegra devices are not booting anymore if DEBUG_LL is enabled
>>> since tegra_uart_config data is executes as a code. Fix the misplaced
>>> tegra_uart_config storage by embedding it into the code.
>>>
>>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>>> Fixes: 2596a72d3384 ("ARM: 9009/1: uncompress: Enable debug in head.S")
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/include/debug/tegra.S | 54 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
>> Looks like arch/arm/include/debug/brcmstb.S would need the same
>> treatment since the implementation was copied from tegra.S.
>>
> 
> Good catch, will you be able to test the brcm and make a patch?

Yes, absolutely, building a kernel to test right now.
-- 
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ