linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: allwinner: Fix some resources leak in the error handling path of the probe and in the remove function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54194e3e-5eb1-d10c-4294-bac8f3933f47@wanadoo.fr>
Date:   Tue, 15 Dec 2020 19:18:48 +0100
From:   Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, wens@...e.org,
        jernej.skrabec@...l.net, timur@...nel.org,
        song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, leon@...nel.org,
        hkallweit1@...il.com, wangyunjian@...wei.com, sr@...x.de,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: allwinner: Fix some resources leak in the error
 handling path of the probe and in the remove function

Le 15/12/2020 à 12:37, Maxime Ripard a écrit :
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:11:53PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 09:56:55AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 09:21:17PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>>>> 'irq_of_parse_and_map()' should be balanced by a corresponding
>>>> 'irq_dispose_mapping()' call. Otherwise, there is some resources leaks.
>>>
>>> Do you have a source to back that? It's not clear at all from the
>>> documentation for those functions, and couldn't find any user calling it
>>> from the ten-or-so random picks I took.
>>
>> It looks like irq_create_of_mapping() needs to be freed with
>> irq_dispose_mapping() so this is correct.
> 
> The doc should be updated first to make that clear then, otherwise we're
> going to fix one user while multiples will have poped up
> 
> Maxime
> 

Hi,

as Dan explained, I think that 'irq_dispose_mapping()' is needed because 
of the 'irq_create_of_mapping()" within 'irq_of_parse_and_map()'.

As you suggest, I'll propose a doc update to make it clear and more 
future proof.

CJ