[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201216073415.GA19511@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 08:34:16 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)" <alx.manpages@...il.com>,
Ted Estes <ted@...twarecrafters.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>,
linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Markus Gutschke <markus@...gle.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Andreas Hobein <ah2@...air.de>
Subject: Re: [Bug 210655] ptrace.2: documentation is incorrect about access
checking threads in same thread group
On 12/15, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 2:48 PM Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)
> <alx.manpages@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > 1) Remove that paragraph, as if that behavior had never existed.
>
> If it's been 15 years since that paragraph was relevant, I think just
> removing it is the right thing to do.
Agreed.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists