[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201216085510.GH4776@dell>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 08:55:10 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Cc: mazziesaccount@...il.com,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
Cong Pham <cpham2403@...il.com>, rostokus@...il.com,
fan.chen@...iatek.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 6/6] MFD: bd71828: differentiate bd71828 and
bd71827 chargers
On Fri, 04 Dec 2020, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> BD71828 and BD71827 charger blocks have some minor differencies.
> Use own name for BD71828 so that charger driver can differentiate
> these by device-id.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
> ---
>
> This patch is also provided in this RFC version only for the sake
> of the completeness.
>
> drivers/mfd/rohm-bd71828.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
For my own reference (apply this as-is to your sign-off block):
Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists