[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2899efa7a9a762531f9a23d216601c697d783b1a.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 09:29:37 +0000
From: "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To: "lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC: "khiem.nguyen.xt@...esas.com" <khiem.nguyen.xt@...esas.com>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"bgolaszewski@...libre.com" <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-power <linux-power@...rohmeurope.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com" <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>,
"yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com" <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/12] mfd: bd9571mwv: Add support for BD9574MWF
On Wed, 2020-12-16 at 09:02 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2020, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2020-12-16 at 16:37 +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> > > From: Khiem Nguyen <khiem.nguyen.xt@...esas.com>
> > >
> > > The new PMIC BD9574MWF inherits features from BD9571MWV.
> > > Add the support of new PMIC to existing bd9571mwv driver.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Khiem Nguyen <khiem.nguyen.xt@...esas.com>
> > > [shimoda: rebase and refactor]
> > > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <
> > > yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/mfd/bd9571mwv.c | 86
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > include/linux/mfd/bd9571mwv.h | 18 +++++++--
> > > 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> ... and please snip long replies.
>
> Scrolling down past lots of un-reviewed code and/or past the end of
> the last review comment is a waste of people's time. Thanks.
>
Hm. Right. I thought that leaving whole patch there when just adding
ack or reviewed-by gives full information as to which exact patch
version was reviewed. But I admit scrolling can be annoying - besides,
the send/receive time in quote can probably be used to track the excat
version which was reviewed. So point taken. Thanks.
Best Regards
Matti
Powered by blists - more mailing lists