lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 16 Dec 2020 10:46:07 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] kvm: check tlbs_dirty directly

On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 10:44:18AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Note, you don't actually need to Cc stable@...r.kernel.org when sending the
> patch.  If/when the patch is merged to Linus' tree, the stable tree maintainers,
> or more accurately their scripts, will automatically pick up the patch and apply
> it to the relevant stable trees.
> 
> You'll probably be getting the following letter from Greg KH any time now :-)

Nope, this was fine, I don't mind seeing the patch before it hits
Linus's tree (or any tree) at all.  It lets me know what to look out
for, nothing was done incorrectly here at all from what I can tell.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ