lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 20:59:56 +0800 From: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mgorman@...hsingularity.net, vincent.guittot@...aro.org Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com, valentin.schneider@....com, qais.yousef@....com, dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, benbjiang@...il.com Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] select_idle_sibling() wreckage Hi Peter, On 2020/12/15 0:48, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Hai, here them patches Mel asked for. They've not (yet) been through the > robots, so there might be some build fail for configs I've not used. > > Benchmark time :-) > Here is the data on my side, benchmarks were tested on a x86 4 sockets system with 24 cores per socket and 2 hyperthreads per core, total 192 CPUs. uperf throughput: netperf workload, tcp_nodelay, r/w size = 90 threads baseline-avg %std patch-avg %std 96 1 0.78 1.0072 1.09 144 1 0.58 1.0204 0.83 192 1 0.66 1.0151 0.52 240 1 2.08 0.8990 0.75 hackbench: process mode, 25600 loops, 40 file descriptors per group group baseline-avg %std patch-avg %std 2(80) 1 10.02 1.0339 9.94 3(120) 1 6.69 1.0049 6.92 4(160) 1 6.76 0.8663 8.74 5(200) 1 2.96 0.9651 4.28 schbench: 99th percentile latency, 16 workers per message thread mthread baseline-avg %std patch-avg %std 6(96) 1 0.88 1.0055 0.81 9(144) 1 0.59 1.0007 0.37 12(192) 1 0.61 0.9973 0.82 15(240) 1 25.05 0.9251 18.36 sysbench mysql throughput: read/write, table size = 10,000,000 thread baseline-avg %std patch-avg %std 96 1 6.62 0.9668 4.04 144 1 9.29 0.9579 6.53 192 1 9.52 0.9503 5.35 240 1 8.55 0.9657 3.34 It looks like - hackbench has a significant improvement of 4 groups - uperf has a significant regression of 240 threads Please let me know if you have any interested cases I can run/rerun. Thanks, -Aubrey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists