linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.9 000/105] 5.9.15-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <X9oJt8y7cMlZ84o/@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Dec 2020 14:20:55 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, pavel@...x.de,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.9 000/105] 5.9.15-rc1 review

On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 07:57:08AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 23:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.9.15 release.
> > There are 105 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 16 Dec 2020 17:25:32 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.9.15-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.9.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
> 
> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> 
> NOTE:
> Following warning(s) reported on arm64 Juno-r2 device.
> sched: core.c:7270 Illegal context switch in RCU-bh read-side critical section!
> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYtu1zOz8ErUzftNG4Dc9=cv1grsagBojJraGhm4arqXyw@mail.gmail.com/T/#u
> 
> Summary
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 

Thanks for testing and letting me know.

greg k-h