[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201216133014.GT3092@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 14:30:14 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
jeyu@...nel.org, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
ardb@...nel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH] jump_label/static_call: Add MAINTAINERS
FWIW, I recently noticed we're not being Cc'ed on patches for this
stuff, so how about we do something like the below?
Anybody holler if they don't agree with the letter assigned, or if they
feel they've been left out entirely and want in on the 'fun' :-)
---
Subject: jump_label/static_call: Add MAINTAINERS
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
These files don't appear to have a MAINTAINERS entry and as such
patches miss being seen by people who know this code.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
MAINTAINERS | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -16766,6 +16766,18 @@ M: Ion Badulescu <ionut@...ula.org>
S: Odd Fixes
F: drivers/net/ethernet/adaptec/starfire*
+STATIC BRANCH/CALL
+M: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
+M: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
+M: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
+R: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
+R: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
+S: Supported
+F: include/linux/jump_label*.h
+F: include/linux/static_call*.h
+F: kernel/jump_label.c
+F: kernel/static_call.c
+
STEC S1220 SKD DRIVER
M: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>
L: linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists