| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAHCN7xL3KU4dA=0-S7J5AEPmjAtpz4j-frEUqBD=JU7BV7g1WA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:03:29 -0600
From: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Adam Ford-BE <aford@...conembedded.com>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/18] arm64: dts: renesas: beacon kit: Configure
programmable clocks
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 8:55 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 7:38 PM Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com> wrote:
> > When the board was added, clock drivers were being updated done at
> > the same time to allow the versaclock driver to properly configure
> > the modes. Unforutnately, the updates were not applied to the board
>
> Unfortunately
Sorry, I can fix that.
>
> > files at the time they should have been, so do it now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/beacon-renesom-baseboard.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/beacon-renesom-baseboard.dtsi
> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> >
> > #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> > #include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
> > +#include <dt-bindings/clk/versaclock.h>
> >
> > / {
> > backlight_lvds: backlight-lvds {
> > @@ -294,12 +295,12 @@ &du_out_rgb {
> > &ehci0 {
> > dr_mode = "otg";
> > status = "okay";
> > - clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 703>, <&cpg CPG_MOD 704>;
> > + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 703>, <&cpg CPG_MOD 704>, <&versaclock5 3>;
>
> Why this change? You said before you don't need this
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-renesas-soc/CAHCN7xJWbP16SA-Ok-5syNnqOZAt8OFJo2_rtg5VrNVsN2-eiQ@mail.gmail.com/
>
I had talked with the hardware guys about buy pre-programmed
versaclock chips which would have been pre-configured and pre-enabled.
I thought it was going to happen, but it didn't, so we need the
versaclock driver to enable the reference clock for the USB
controllers, ethernet controller and audio clocks. Previously we were
manually configuring it or it was coincidentally working. Ideally,
we'd have the clock system intentionally enable/disable the clocks
when drivers are loaded/unloaded for for power management reasons.
> BTW, something I missed in the earlier review: is there an override
> needed at all?
We need the versaclock for sure. I'll do some more testing and try to
clean this up in the next revision.
>
> > };
> >
> > &ehci1 {
> > status = "okay";
> > - clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 703>, <&cpg CPG_MOD 704>;
> > + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 703>, <&cpg CPG_MOD 704>, <&versaclock5 3>;
>
> Same here.
>
> BTW, something I missed in the earlier review: why did you override
>
> clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 702>;
>
> by
>
> clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 703>, <&cpg CPG_MOD 704>;
Might be an accidental copy-paste error. I need to review all three
SoC's and adjust the device trees accordingly.
>
> ?
>
> > };
> >
> > &hdmi0 {
> > @@ -373,12 +374,40 @@ versaclock6_bb: clock-controller@6a {
> > #clock-cells = <1>;
> > clocks = <&x304_clk>;
> > clock-names = "xin";
> > - /* CSI0_MCLK, CSI1_MCLK, AUDIO_CLKIN, USB_HUB_MCLK_BB */
> > + clock-output-names = "versaclock6_bb.out0_sel_i2cb",
> > + "versaclock6_bb.out1",
> > + "versaclock6_bb.out2",
> > + "versaclock6_bb.out3",
> > + "versaclock6_bb.out4";
>
> Why? IIUIC, the driver doesn't parse clock-output-names
> (and it shouldn't).
This was probably copy-paste from an internal repo we have using an
older, customized kernel due to clashing of names with more than one
versaclock was available. I'll remove it during the next revision.
>
> > assigned-clocks = <&versaclock6_bb 1>,
> > <&versaclock6_bb 2>,
> > <&versaclock6_bb 3>,
> > <&versaclock6_bb 4>;
> > assigned-clock-rates = <24000000>, <24000000>, <24000000>, <24576000>;
> > +
> > + OUT1 {
> > + idt,mode = <VC5_CMOS>;
> > + idt,voltage-microvolts = <1800000>;
>
> Oops. The DT bindings say "idt,voltage-microvolt", the example in the DT
> bindings says "idt,voltage-microvolts", and the driver parses
> "idt,voltage-microvolts".
>
> According to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/property-units.txt, the
> property name should end in "microvolt".
>
> Patch sent.
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20201216145231.1344317-1-geert+renesas@glider.be/
>
Thanks for that. I'll submit an update based on the patch you sent.
adam
> > + idt,slew-percent = <100>;
> > + };
>
Thank you for the review. Is that the only patch in the series with
concerns? I probably won't get to V2 until this weekend.
adam
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
>
> > files at the time they should have been, so do it now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/beacon-renesom-baseboard.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/beacon-renesom-baseboard.dtsi
> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> >
> > #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> > #include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
> > +#include <dt-bindings/clk/versaclock.h>
> >
> > / {
> > backlight_lvds: backlight-lvds {
> > @@ -294,12 +295,12 @@ &du_out_rgb {
> > &ehci0 {
> > dr_mode = "otg";
> > status = "okay";
> > - clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 703>, <&cpg CPG_MOD 704>;
> > + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 703>, <&cpg CPG_MOD 704>, <&versaclock5 3>;
>
> Why this change? You said before you don't need this
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-renesas-soc/CAHCN7xJWbP16SA-Ok-5syNnqOZAt8OFJo2_rtg5VrNVsN2-eiQ@mail.gmail.com/
>
> BTW, something I missed in the earlier review: is there an override
> needed at all?
>
> > };
> >
> > &ehci1 {
> > status = "okay";
> > - clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 703>, <&cpg CPG_MOD 704>;
> > + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 703>, <&cpg CPG_MOD 704>, <&versaclock5 3>;
>
> Same here.
>
> BTW, something I missed in the earlier review: why did you override
>
> clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 702>;
>
> by
>
> clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 703>, <&cpg CPG_MOD 704>;
>
> ?
>
> > };
> >
> > &hdmi0 {
> > @@ -373,12 +374,40 @@ versaclock6_bb: clock-controller@6a {
> > #clock-cells = <1>;
> > clocks = <&x304_clk>;
> > clock-names = "xin";
> > - /* CSI0_MCLK, CSI1_MCLK, AUDIO_CLKIN, USB_HUB_MCLK_BB */
> > + clock-output-names = "versaclock6_bb.out0_sel_i2cb",
> > + "versaclock6_bb.out1",
> > + "versaclock6_bb.out2",
> > + "versaclock6_bb.out3",
> > + "versaclock6_bb.out4";
>
> Why? IIUIC, the driver doesn't parse clock-output-names
> (and it shouldn't).
>
> > assigned-clocks = <&versaclock6_bb 1>,
> > <&versaclock6_bb 2>,
> > <&versaclock6_bb 3>,
> > <&versaclock6_bb 4>;
> > assigned-clock-rates = <24000000>, <24000000>, <24000000>, <24576000>;
> > +
> > + OUT1 {
> > + idt,mode = <VC5_CMOS>;
> > + idt,voltage-microvolts = <1800000>;
>
> Oops. The DT bindings say "idt,voltage-microvolt", the example in the DT
> bindings says "idt,voltage-microvolts", and the driver parses
> "idt,voltage-microvolts".
>
> According to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/property-units.txt, the
> property name should end in "microvolt".
>
> Patch sent.
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20201216145231.1344317-1-geert+renesas@glider.be/
>
> > + idt,slew-percent = <100>;
> > + };
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists