[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <600ff528-71b0-ac02-0266-ddc5e3b6fcf4@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 17:30:43 +0000
From: Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@...labora.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernelci-results@...ups.io" <kernelci-results@...ups.io>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
Collabora Kernel ML <kernel@...labora.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: linusw/devel bisection:
baseline.bootrr.mediatek-mt8173-pinctrl-probed on mt8173-elm-hana
On 16/12/2020 12:41, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 11:10 AM Guillaume Tucker
> <guillaume.tucker@...labora.com> wrote:
>
>>> It seems we need to teach the core to ignore the name (empty string).
>>
>> OK great, I see you've sent a patch for that. I'll check if we
>> can confirm it fixes the issue (something I'd like to also
>> automate...).
>
> Yups would love to hear if this solves it, it should be in today's
> -next.
Yes in fact it appears to be all fixed on your for-next branch:
https://kernelci.org/test/case/id/5fda32f92738afa48dc94ce1/
Today's linux-next was not tested in the Collabora lab because of
some infrastructure problem, but that's resolved now so it should
be in tomorrow's results.
Best wishes,
Guillaume
Powered by blists - more mailing lists