linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: core: fix msleep() is not accurate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:33:50 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Yejune Deng <yejune.deng@...il.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, ast@...nel.org, andriin@...com,
        jiri@...lanox.com, edumazet@...gle.com, ap420073@...il.com,
        bjorn.topel@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: core: fix msleep() is not accurate

On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:04:25 +0800 Yejune Deng wrote:
> See Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst, msleep() is not
> for (1ms - 20ms), use usleep_range() instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yejune Deng <yejune.deng@...il.com>

# Form letter - net-next is closed

We have already sent the networking pull request for 5.11 and therefore
net-next is closed for new drivers, features, code refactoring and
optimizations. We are currently accepting bug fixes only.

Please repost when net-next reopens after 5.11-rc1 is cut.

Look out for the announcement on the mailing list or check:
http://vger.kernel.org/~davem/net-next.html

RFC patches sent for review only are obviously welcome at any time.