Date:   Wed, 16 Dec 2020 15:32:42 -0500
From:   Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>,
        h@...av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com
Cc:     linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, borntraeger@...ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
        mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
        kwankhede@...dia.com, fiuczy@...ux.ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
        david@...hat.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 14/17] s390/zcrypt: Notify driver on config changed
 and scan complete callbacks



On 12/9/20 2:20 AM, Harald Freudenberger wrote:
> On 30.11.20 10:18, h@...av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:40:13 -0500
>> Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This patch intruduces an extension to the ap bus to notify device drivers
>>> when the host AP configuration changes - i.e., adapters, domains or
>>> control domains are added or removed. To that end, two new callbacks are
>>> introduced for AP device drivers:
>>>
>>>    void (*on_config_changed)(struct ap_config_info *new_config_info,
>>>                              struct ap_config_info *old_config_info);
>>>
>>>       This callback is invoked at the start of the AP bus scan
>>>       function when it determines that the host AP configuration information
>>>       has changed since the previous scan. This is done by storing
>>>       an old and current QCI info struct and comparing them. If there is any
>>>       difference, the callback is invoked.
>>>
>>>       Note that when the AP bus scan detects that AP adapters, domains or
>>>       control domains have been removed from the host's AP configuration, it
>>>       will remove the associated devices from the AP bus subsystem's device
>>>       model. This callback gives the device driver a chance to respond to
>>>       the removal of the AP devices from the host configuration prior to
>>>       calling the device driver's remove callback. The primary purpose of
>>>       this callback is to allow the vfio_ap driver to do a bulk unplug of
>>>       all affected adapters, domains and control domains from affected
>>>       guests rather than unplugging them one at a time when the remove
>>>       callback is invoked.
>>>
>>>    void (*on_scan_complete)(struct ap_config_info *new_config_info,
>>>                             struct ap_config_info *old_config_info);
>>>
>>>       The on_scan_complete callback is invoked after the ap bus scan is
>>>       complete if the host AP configuration data has changed.
>>>
>>>       Note that when the AP bus scan detects that adapters, domains or
>>>       control domains have been added to the host's configuration, it will
>>>       create new devices in the AP bus subsystem's device model. The primary
>>>       purpose of this callback is to allow the vfio_ap driver to do a bulk
>>>       plug of all affected adapters, domains and control domains into
>>>       affected guests rather than plugging them one at a time when the
>>>       probe callback is invoked.
>>>
>>> Please note that changes to the apmask and aqmask do not trigger
>>> these two callbacks since the bus scan function is not invoked by changes
>>> to those masks.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c          | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>   drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h          | 12 ++++
>>>   drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h | 14 ++++-
>>>   3 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c
>>> index 593573740981..3a63f6b33d8a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c
>>> @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ DEFINE_MUTEX(ap_perms_mutex);
>>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(ap_perms_mutex);
>>>   
>>>   static struct ap_config_info *ap_qci_info;
>>> +static struct ap_config_info *ap_qci_info_old;
>>>   
>>>   /*
>>>    * AP bus related debug feature things.
>>> @@ -1440,6 +1441,52 @@ static int __match_queue_device_with_queue_id(struct device *dev, const void *da
>>>   		&& AP_QID_QUEUE(to_ap_queue(dev)->qid) == (int)(long) data;
>>>   }
>>>   
>>> +/* Helper function for notify_config_changed */
>>> +static int __drv_notify_config_changed(struct device_driver *drv, void *data)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct ap_driver *ap_drv = to_ap_drv(drv);
>>> +
>>> +	if (try_module_get(drv->owner)) {
>>> +		if (ap_drv->on_config_changed)
>>> +			ap_drv->on_config_changed(ap_qci_info,
>>> +						  ap_qci_info_old);
>>> +		module_put(drv->owner);
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/* Notify all drivers about an qci config change */
>>> +static inline void notify_config_changed(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	bus_for_each_drv(&ap_bus_type, NULL, NULL,
>>> +			 __drv_notify_config_changed);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/* Helper function for notify_scan_complete */
>>> +static int __drv_notify_scan_complete(struct device_driver *drv, void *data)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct ap_driver *ap_drv = to_ap_drv(drv);
>>> +
>>> +	if (try_module_get(drv->owner)) {
>>> +		if (ap_drv->on_scan_complete)
>>> +			ap_drv->on_scan_complete(ap_qci_info,
>>> +						 ap_qci_info_old);
>>> +		module_put(drv->owner);
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/* Notify all drivers about bus scan complete */
>>> +static inline void notify_scan_complete(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	bus_for_each_drv(&ap_bus_type, NULL, NULL,
>>> +			 __drv_notify_scan_complete);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +
>>>   /*
>>>    * Helper function for ap_scan_bus().
>>>    * Remove card device and associated queue devices.
>>> @@ -1718,15 +1765,43 @@ static inline void ap_scan_adapter(int ap)
>>>   	put_device(&ac->ap_dev.device);
>>>   }
>>>   
>>> +static int ap_get_configuration(void)
>> I believe this was Haralds request. I'm OO contaminated, but
>> the signature and the semantic does not mash well with my understanding
>> of a 'getter'. Especially the return value being actually a boolean and
>> 'configuration changed/still the same'. From the signature it looks more
>> like the usual C-stlyle try to do something and return 0 if OK, otherwise
>> error code != 0.
>>
>> Since it's Haralds dominion, I'm not asking you to change this, but we
>> could at least document the return value (maybe also the behavior).
> Well, no. This function comes from Tony. And you can see a mixture of
> bool and int return values within the AP code. Historically there was no bool
> and it was very long frowned upon using bool within the kernel.
> However, long term I'd like to use bool for all these true/false functions and
> so Tony if you need to touch this anyway you could change to bool here.

I will change the return code to a bool.

>
> Tony, as you anyway need to rebase here - the ap code has significant changed in this corner -
> should I pull these changes within the ap bus code from your patch series and push them
> into the development branch after some adaptions to the current code ?

This can be done, however I worry about creating pre-reqs for this patch
series. Are the changes you are talking about not yet in the code base?
In other words, if rebasing this off of our master branch not enough?
If that is the case and you want to pull these changes into your code,
that may be fine. I will be posting v13 before I leave for Christmas
vacation and I have no reason to expect, based on the review history for
this series, that the next review will be the final one. I will not be 
returning
until late in the first week of January, so that should give enough time 
for all
of this to resolve itself.

>>> +{
>>> +	int cfg_chg = 0;
>>> +
>>> +	if (ap_qci_info) {
>>> +		if (!ap_qci_info_old) {
>>> +			ap_qci_info_old = kzalloc(sizeof(*ap_qci_info_old),
>>> +						  GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +			if (!ap_qci_info_old)
>>> +				return 0;
>>> +		} else {
>>> +			memcpy(ap_qci_info_old, ap_qci_info,
>>> +			       sizeof(struct ap_config_info));
>>> +		}
>>> +		ap_fetch_qci_info(ap_qci_info);
>>> +		cfg_chg = memcmp(ap_qci_info,
>>> +				 ap_qci_info_old,
>>> +				 sizeof(struct ap_config_info)) != 0;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	return cfg_chg;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>   /**
>>>    * ap_scan_bus(): Scan the AP bus for new devices
>>>    * Runs periodically, workqueue timer (ap_config_time)
>>>    */
>>>   static void ap_scan_bus(struct work_struct *unused)
>>>   {
>>> -	int ap;
>>> +	int ap, config_changed = 0;
>>>   
>>> -	ap_fetch_qci_info(ap_qci_info);
>>> +	/* config change notify */
>>> +	config_changed = ap_get_configuration();
>>> +	if (config_changed)
>>> +		notify_config_changed();
>>> +	memcpy(ap_qci_info_old, ap_qci_info,
>>> +	       sizeof(struct ap_config_info));
>> Why is this memcpy needed? Isn't that already take care of in
>> ap_get_configuration()?
>>
>>>   	ap_select_domain();
>>>   
>>>   	AP_DBF_DBG("%s running\n", __func__);
>>> @@ -1735,6 +1810,10 @@ static void ap_scan_bus(struct work_struct *unused)
>>>   	for (ap = 0; ap <= ap_max_adapter_id; ap++)
>>>   		ap_scan_adapter(ap);
>>>   
>>> +	/* scan complete notify */
>>> +	if (config_changed)
>>> +		notify_scan_complete();
>>> +
>>>   	/* check if there is at least one queue available with default domain */
>>>   	if (ap_domain_index >= 0) {
>>>   		struct device *dev =
>>> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h b/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h
>>> index 65edd847c65a..fbfbf6991718 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h
>>> @@ -146,6 +146,18 @@ struct ap_driver {
>>>   	int (*probe)(struct ap_device *);
>>>   	void (*remove)(struct ap_device *);
>>>   	int (*in_use)(unsigned long *apm, unsigned long *aqm);
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * Called at the start of the ap bus scan function when
>>> +	 * the crypto config information (qci) has changed.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	void (*on_config_changed)(struct ap_config_info *new_config_info,
>>> +				  struct ap_config_info *old_config_info);
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * Called at the end of the ap bus scan function when
>>> +	 * the crypto config information (qci) has changed.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	void (*on_scan_complete)(struct ap_config_info *new_config_info,
>>> +				 struct ap_config_info *old_config_info);
>>>   };
>>>   
>>>   #define to_ap_drv(x) container_of((x), struct ap_driver, driver)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
>>> index 15b7cd74843b..7bd7e35eb2e0 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
>> These changes probably belong to some next patch...
>>
>> With the things I just brought up clarified, you can slap a:
>> Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
>> over it next time.
>>
>>> @@ -36,14 +36,21 @@
>>>    *		driver, be it using @mdev_list or writing the state of a
>>>    *		single ap_matrix_mdev device. It's quite coarse but we don't
>>>    *		expect much contention.
>>> + ** @ap_add:	a bitmap specifying the APIDs added to the host AP configuration
>>> + *		as notified by the AP bus via the on_cfg_chg callback.
>>> + * @aq_add:	a bitmap specifying the APQIs added to the host AP configuration
>>> + *		as notified by the AP bus via the on_cfg_chg callback.
>>>    */
>>>   struct ap_matrix_dev {
>>>   	struct device device;
>>>   	atomic_t available_instances;
>>> -	struct ap_config_info info;
>>> +	struct ap_config_info config_info;
>>> +	struct ap_config_info config_info_prev;
>>>   	struct list_head mdev_list;
>>>   	struct mutex lock;
>>>   	struct ap_driver  *vfio_ap_drv;
>>> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(ap_add, AP_DEVICES);
>>> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(aq_add, AP_DEVICES);
>>>   };
>>>   
>>>   extern struct ap_matrix_dev *matrix_dev;
>>> @@ -90,6 +97,8 @@ struct ap_matrix_mdev {
>>>   	struct kvm_s390_module_hook pqap_hook;
>>>   	struct mdev_device *mdev;
>>>   	DECLARE_HASHTABLE(qtable, 8);
>>> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(ap_add, AP_DEVICES);
>>> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(aq_add, AP_DEVICES);
>>>   };
>>>   
>>>   extern int vfio_ap_mdev_register(void);
>>> @@ -109,4 +118,7 @@ void vfio_ap_mdev_remove_queue(struct ap_device *queue);
>>>   
>>>   int vfio_ap_mdev_resource_in_use(unsigned long *apm, unsigned long *aqm);
>>>   
>>> +void vfio_ap_on_cfg_changed(struct ap_config_info *new_config_info,
>>> +			    struct ap_config_info *old_config_info);
>>> +
>>>   #endif /* _VFIO_AP_PRIVATE_H_ */

Powered by blists - more mailing lists