linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the risc-v tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 17 Dec 2020 11:40:51 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the risc-v tree

On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 3:28 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 20:21:07 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
> >
> >   lib/Makefile
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> >   527701eda5f1 ("lib: Add a generic version of devmem_is_allowed()")
> >
> > from the risc-v tree and commits:
> >
> >   8250e121c672 ("lib/list_kunit: follow new file name convention for KUnit tests")
> >   17bf776cf09a ("lib/linear_ranges_kunit: follow new file name convention for KUnit tests")
> >   23fa4e39ee62 ("lib/bits_kunit: follow new file name convention for KUnit tests")
> >   1987f84faec6 ("lib/cmdline_kunit: add a new test suite for cmdline API")

AFAIU Linus rejected the above patches. I hope kselftest/kunit tree
can pick them up.

> > diff --cc lib/Makefile
> > index bcedd691ef63,dc623561ef9d..000000000000
> > --- a/lib/Makefile
> > +++ b/lib/Makefile
> > @@@ -350,8 -350,7 +350,9 @@@ obj-$(CONFIG_PLDMFW) += pldmfw
> >
> >   # KUnit tests
> >   obj-$(CONFIG_BITFIELD_KUNIT) += bitfield_kunit.o
> > - obj-$(CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST) += list-test.o
> > - obj-$(CONFIG_LINEAR_RANGES_TEST) += test_linear_ranges.o
> > - obj-$(CONFIG_BITS_TEST) += test_bits.o
> > + obj-$(CONFIG_BITS_TEST) += bits_kunit.o
> > + obj-$(CONFIG_CMDLINE_KUNIT_TEST) += cmdline_kunit.o
> > + obj-$(CONFIG_LINEAR_RANGES_TEST) += linear_ranges_kunit.o
> > + obj-$(CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST) += list_kunit.o
> >  +
> >  +obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_LIB_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED) += devmem_is_allowed.o
>
> This is now a conflict between the risc-v tree and Linus' tree.

Yeah, and it's slightly different. Perhaps RISC-V tree can handle this
by moving Makefile entry somewhere else in the file.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko