[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <160819854054.1580929.11774494737699871550@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 01:49:00 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
t-kristo@...com
Cc: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] ti/fapll: Delete useless kfree code
Quoting Zheng Yongjun (2020-12-16 05:05:34)
> The parameter of kfree function is NULL, so kfree code is useless, delete it.
Not always though. Sometimes it is non-NULL and this code avoids a goto.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c b/drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c
> index 95e36ba64acc..a61d69159e9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c
> @@ -523,7 +523,6 @@ static struct clk * __init ti_fapll_synth_setup(struct fapll_data *fd,
> return clk_register(NULL, &synth->hw);
>
> free:
> - kfree(synth);
> kfree(init);
>
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists