[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201217134253.GE15600@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 13:42:53 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/25] btrfs: Use readahead_batch_length
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:12:46PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> ehh ... probably an off-by-one. Does subtracting 1 from contig_end fix it?
> I'll spool up a test VM shortly and try it out.
Yes, this fixed it:
- u64 contig_end = contig_start + readahead_batch_length(rac);
+ u64 contig_end = contig_start + readahead_batch_length(rac) - 1;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists