| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <X9uaXpZ5FmKZgZqs@workstation.tuxnet>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 18:50:22 +0100
From: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@...ruber.com>
To: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/7] pwm: pca9685: Support staggered output ON times
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 11:02:57PM -0500, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> Hi Clemens, see below.
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 7:53 AM Clemens Gruber
> <clemens.gruber@...ruber.com> wrote:
> >
> > The PCA9685 supports staggered LED output ON times to minimize current
> > surges and reduce EMI.
> > When this new option is enabled, the ON times of each channel are
> > delayed by channel number x counter range / 16, which avoids asserting
> > all enabled outputs at the same counter value while still maintaining
> > the configured duty cycle of each output.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@...ruber.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
> > index 38aadaf50996..ff916980de49 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
> > @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@
> > struct pca9685 {
> > struct pwm_chip chip;
> > struct regmap *regmap;
> > + bool staggered_outputs;
> > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GPIOLIB)
> > struct mutex lock;
> > struct gpio_chip gpio;
> > @@ -93,45 +94,79 @@ static inline struct pca9685 *to_pca(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> >
> > static void pca9685_pwm_set_duty(struct pca9685 *pca, int channel, unsigned int duty)
> > {
> > + unsigned int on, off;
> > +
> > if (duty == 0) {
> > /* Set the full OFF bit, which has the highest precedence */
> > regmap_write(pca->regmap, REG_OFF_H(channel), LED_FULL);
> > + return;
> > } else if (duty >= PCA9685_COUNTER_RANGE) {
> > /* Set the full ON bit and clear the full OFF bit */
> > regmap_write(pca->regmap, REG_ON_H(channel), LED_FULL);
> > regmap_write(pca->regmap, REG_OFF_H(channel), 0);
> > - } else {
> > - /* Set OFF time (clears the full OFF bit) */
> > - regmap_write(pca->regmap, REG_OFF_L(channel), duty & 0xff);
> > - regmap_write(pca->regmap, REG_OFF_H(channel), (duty >> 8) & 0xf);
> > - /* Clear the full ON bit */
> > - regmap_write(pca->regmap, REG_ON_H(channel), 0);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (pca->staggered_outputs) {
> > + if (channel < PCA9685_MAXCHAN) {
> > + /*
> > + * To reduce EMI, the ON times of each channel are
> > + * spread out evenly within the counter range, while
> > + * still maintaining the configured duty cycle
> > + */
> > + on = channel * PCA9685_COUNTER_RANGE / PCA9685_MAXCHAN;
> > + off = (on + duty) % PCA9685_COUNTER_RANGE;
> > + regmap_write(pca->regmap, REG_ON_L(channel), on & 0xff);
> > + regmap_write(pca->regmap, REG_ON_H(channel), (on >> 8) & 0xf);
> > + regmap_write(pca->regmap, REG_OFF_L(channel), off & 0xff);
> > + regmap_write(pca->regmap, REG_OFF_H(channel), (off >> 8) & 0xf);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + /* No staggering possible if "all LEDs" channel is used */
> > + regmap_write(pca->regmap, PCA9685_ALL_LED_ON_L, 0);
> > }
> > + /* Set OFF time (clears the full OFF bit) */
> > + regmap_write(pca->regmap, REG_OFF_L(channel), duty & 0xff);
> > + regmap_write(pca->regmap, REG_OFF_H(channel), (duty >> 8) & 0xf);
> > + /* Clear the full ON bit */
> > + regmap_write(pca->regmap, REG_ON_H(channel), 0);
> > }
>
> I find the set_duty() function quite hard to follow.
> Can we simplify this by eliminating the !staggered_outputs special case?
> E.g. always calculate and write 'on' and 'off'.
> But if !staggered_outputs => on = 0 and off = duty.
>
> Yes this adds one extra/unnecessary register write in the !staggered case,
> but simplicity/maintainability >>> efficiency here. And this "issue" will
> disappear when we switch on regmap caching.
No objections, I will eliminate the special case.
>
> >
> > static unsigned int pca9685_pwm_get_duty(struct pca9685 *pca, int channel)
> > {
> > - unsigned int off_h, val;
> > + unsigned int off, on, val;
> >
> > if (WARN_ON(channel >= PCA9685_MAXCHAN)) {
> > /* Hardware readout not supported for "all LEDs" channel */
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > - regmap_read(pca->regmap, LED_N_OFF_H(channel), &off_h);
> > - if (off_h & LED_FULL) {
> > + regmap_read(pca->regmap, LED_N_OFF_H(channel), &off);
> > + if (off & LED_FULL) {
> > /* Full OFF bit is set */
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > - regmap_read(pca->regmap, LED_N_ON_H(channel), &val);
> > - if (val & LED_FULL) {
> > + regmap_read(pca->regmap, LED_N_ON_H(channel), &on);
> > + if (on & LED_FULL) {
> > /* Full ON bit is set */
> > return PCA9685_COUNTER_RANGE;
> > }
> >
> > regmap_read(pca->regmap, LED_N_OFF_L(channel), &val);
> > - return ((off_h & 0xf) << 8) | (val & 0xff);
> > + off = ((off & 0xf) << 8) | (val & 0xff);
> > +
> > + if (pca->staggered_outputs) {
> > + regmap_read(pca->regmap, LED_N_ON_L(channel), &val);
> > + on = ((on & 0xf) << 8) | (val & 0xff);
> > +
> > + if (off >= on)
> > + return off - on;
> > + else
> > + return off + PCA9685_COUNTER_RANGE - on;
>
> I think the if/else is unnecessary. unsigned int is twos-complement,
> so we can just write:
>
> return (off - on) & 0xfff; (or PCA9685_COUNTER_RANGE - 1)
>
> and it will "magically" work even if off < on.
Ah, yes of course. Good catch!
>
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + return off;
> > }
>
> As in set_duty(), consider removing the !staggered_outputs special case,
> to make this function clearer and simpler.
Yes, thanks.
>
> >
> > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GPIOLIB)
> > @@ -442,6 +477,9 @@ static int pca9685_pwm_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >
> > regmap_write(pca->regmap, PCA9685_MODE2, reg);
> >
> > + pca->staggered_outputs = device_property_read_bool(
> > + &client->dev, "nxp,staggered-outputs");
> > +
> > /* Disable all LED ALLCALL and SUBx addresses to avoid bus collisions */
> > regmap_read(pca->regmap, PCA9685_MODE1, ®);
> > reg &= ~(MODE1_ALLCALL | MODE1_SUB1 | MODE1_SUB2 | MODE1_SUB3);
> > --
> > 2.29.2
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists