| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 11:19:21 +0800
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, paulmck@...nel.org,
mchehab+huawei@...nel.org, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, oneukum@...e.com,
anshuman.khandual@....com, jroedel@...e.de,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
"Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Xiongchun duan <duanxiongchun@...edance.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v9 04/11] mm/hugetlb: Defer freeing of
HugeTLB pages
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 7:48 AM Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/13/20 7:45 AM, Muchun Song wrote:
> > In the subsequent patch, we will allocate the vmemmap pages when free
> > HugeTLB pages. But update_and_free_page() is called from a non-task
> > context(and hold hugetlb_lock), so we can defer the actual freeing in
> > a workqueue to prevent use GFP_ATOMIC to allocate the vmemmap pages.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
>
> It is unfortunate we need to add this complexitty, but I can not think
> of another way. One small comment (no required change) below.
>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Thank you.
>
> > ---
> > mm/hugetlb.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c | 12 --------
> > mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.h | 17 ++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > index 140135fc8113..0ff9b90e524f 100644
> > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > @@ -1292,15 +1292,76 @@ static inline void destroy_compound_gigantic_page(struct page *page,
> > unsigned int order) { }
> > #endif
> >
> > -static void update_and_free_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page)
> > +static void __free_hugepage(struct hstate *h, struct page *page);
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * As update_and_free_page() is be called from a non-task context(and hold
> > + * hugetlb_lock), we can defer the actual freeing in a workqueue to prevent
> > + * use GFP_ATOMIC to allocate a lot of vmemmap pages.
> > + *
> > + * update_hpage_vmemmap_workfn() locklessly retrieves the linked list of
> > + * pages to be freed and frees them one-by-one. As the page->mapping pointer
> > + * is going to be cleared in update_hpage_vmemmap_workfn() anyway, it is
> > + * reused as the llist_node structure of a lockless linked list of huge
> > + * pages to be freed.
> > + */
> > +static LLIST_HEAD(hpage_update_freelist);
> > +
> > +static void update_hpage_vmemmap_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
> > {
> > - int i;
> > + struct llist_node *node;
> > + struct page *page;
> > +
> > + node = llist_del_all(&hpage_update_freelist);
> >
> > + while (node) {
> > + page = container_of((struct address_space **)node,
> > + struct page, mapping);
> > + node = node->next;
> > + page->mapping = NULL;
> > + __free_hugepage(page_hstate(page), page);
> > +
> > + cond_resched();
> > + }
> > +}
> > +static DECLARE_WORK(hpage_update_work, update_hpage_vmemmap_workfn);
> > +
> > +static inline void __update_and_free_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page)
> > +{
> > + /* No need to allocate vmemmap pages */
> > + if (!free_vmemmap_pages_per_hpage(h)) {
> > + __free_hugepage(h, page);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Defer freeing to avoid using GFP_ATOMIC to allocate vmemmap
> > + * pages.
> > + *
> > + * Only call schedule_work() if hpage_update_freelist is previously
> > + * empty. Otherwise, schedule_work() had been called but the workfn
> > + * hasn't retrieved the list yet.
> > + */
> > + if (llist_add((struct llist_node *)&page->mapping,
> > + &hpage_update_freelist))
> > + schedule_work(&hpage_update_work);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void update_and_free_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page)
> > +{
> > if (hstate_is_gigantic(h) && !gigantic_page_runtime_supported())
> > return;
> >
> > h->nr_huge_pages--;
> > h->nr_huge_pages_node[page_to_nid(page)]--;
> > +
> > + __update_and_free_page(h, page);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void __free_hugepage(struct hstate *h, struct page *page)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
>
> Can we add a comment here saying that this is where the call to allocate
> vmemmmap pages will be inserted in a later patch. Such a comment would
> help a bit to understand the restructuring of the code.
OK. Will do. Thanks.
>
> --
> Mike Kravetz
>
> > for (i = 0; i < pages_per_huge_page(h); i++) {
> > page[i].flags &= ~(1 << PG_locked | 1 << PG_error |
> > 1 << PG_referenced | 1 << PG_dirty |
> > @@ -1313,13 +1374,17 @@ static void update_and_free_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page)
> > set_page_refcounted(page);
> > if (hstate_is_gigantic(h)) {
> > /*
> > - * Temporarily drop the hugetlb_lock, because
> > - * we might block in free_gigantic_page().
> > + * Temporarily drop the hugetlb_lock only when this type of
> > + * HugeTLB page does not support vmemmap optimization (which
> > + * contex do not hold the hugetlb_lock), because we might block
> > + * in free_gigantic_page().
> > */
> > - spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> > + if (!free_vmemmap_pages_per_hpage(h))
> > + spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> > destroy_compound_gigantic_page(page, huge_page_order(h));
> > free_gigantic_page(page, huge_page_order(h));
> > - spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> > + if (!free_vmemmap_pages_per_hpage(h))
> > + spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> > } else {
> > __free_pages(page, huge_page_order(h));
> > }
--
Yours,
Muchun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists