[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201217105323.4d882a7d@lwn.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 10:53:23 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
john.stultz@...aro.org, acme@...hat.com, frederic@...nel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] Documentation/process: Add subsystem/tree handbook
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 16:05:37 +0100
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> So, that thing.
>
> I have this ontop of 5.10 along with most comments integrated.
>
> Now, I'm thinking if I start sending those pieces which belong into the
> main process documentation, the bikeshedding that is going to ensue is
> going to be insane. And we have day jobs too, you know. :)
>
> Thus, I'm also thinking that I should do this piecemeal and once we've
> all agreed on one aspect and you've applied it, Jon, I'll carve out and
> send the next. Rinse and repeat.
>
> How does that sound, makes sense?
Gee...a response from a two-year-old thread...it's taking me a while to
page all of that back in :)
I'd love to see this work get in, I still feel bad about my part in
stalling it before.
Piecemeal could certainly work, or we could just try the whole thing and
see what happens. We got Thorsten's reporting-issues tome in without much
trouble, after all, and that's bikeshed territory if anything is. But
whatever works is fine; send stuff and I'll gladly look at it.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists