linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 03/48] dt-bindings: memory: tegra124: emc: Replace core regulator with power domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201217180638.22748-4-digetx@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Dec 2020 21:05:53 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
        Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@...il.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 03/48] dt-bindings: memory: tegra124: emc: Replace core regulator with power domain

Power domain fits much better than a voltage regulator in regards to
a proper hardware description and from a software perspective as well.
Hence replace the core regulator with the power domain. Note that this
doesn't affect any existing DTBs because we haven't started to use the
regulator yet, and thus, it's okay to change it.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
---
 .../bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra124-emc.yaml    | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra124-emc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra124-emc.yaml
index 09bde65e1955..2ab42b05e198 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra124-emc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra124-emc.yaml
@@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ properties:
     description:
       phandle of the memory controller node
 
-  core-supply:
+  power-domains:
     description:
-      Phandle of voltage regulator of the SoC "core" power domain.
+      Phandle to the SoC "core" power domain.
 
   operating-points-v2:
     description:
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ examples:
 
         nvidia,memory-controller = <&mc>;
         operating-points-v2 = <&dvfs_opp_table>;
-        core-supply = <&vdd_core>;
+        power-domains = <&domain>;
 
         #interconnect-cells = <0>;
 
-- 
2.29.2