[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1ce4502a-d75a-7e27-5844-f195607c4c99@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:05:31 +0530
From: Aditya <yashsri421@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: lukas.bulwahn@...il.com,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: fix false positive for COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE
with URLs
On 17/12/20 10:33 pm, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-12-17 at 19:12 +0530, Aditya Srivastava wrote:
>> Currently checkpatch warns for long line in commit messages even for
>> URL lines.
>>
>> An evaluation over v4.13..v5.8 showed that out of ~11000 warnings for
>> this class, around 790 are due to the line containing link.
>>
>> E.g. running checkpatch on commit 3cde818cd02b ("ASoC: topology:
>> Consolidate how dtexts and dvalues are freed") reports this warning:
>>
>> WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
>> https://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2019-January/144761.html
>>
>> Avoid giving users warning for character limit, instead suggest them to
>> prefix the URLs with "Link:"
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@...il.com>
>> ---
>> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 10 ++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> []
>> @@ -3032,8 +3032,14 @@ sub process {
>> $line =~ /^\s*(?:Fixes:|Link:|$signature_tags)/i ||
>> # A Fixes: or Link: line or signature tag line
>> $commit_log_possible_stack_dump)) {
>> - WARN("COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE",
>> - "Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)\n" . $herecurr);
>> + if ($line =~ /(?:http|https|ftp):\/\//) {
>> + WARN("COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE",
>> + "Consider prefixing the URL with 'Link:'\n" . $herecurr);
>> + }
>> + else {
>> + WARN("COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE",
>> + "Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)\n" . $herecurr);
>> + }
>
> NAK.
>
> Aditya, you've submitted several patches to checkpatch and
> you should know better by now what coding style is necessary
> for acceptance.
>
> } else {
>
Sorry, I missed it. Will change it :)
> Make the URI/URL check follow the styles allowed by RFC 3986.
> Look at the long_line check around line 3500 introduced by
> commit 2e4bbbc550be336cbb3defc67430fc0700aa1426
> Author: Andreas Brauchli <a.brauchli@...mentarea.net>
> Date: Tue Feb 6 15:38:45 2018 -0800
> checkpatch: allow long lines containing URL
>
> Also likely the URI should not be allowed to exceed the line
> maximum unless it's the first non-whitespace of the line and
> not starting after some other word in the line.
>
> Lastly, this sets $commit_log_long_line even for lines that
> are now nominally exempted from the long line check.
>
Okay. I'll make these changes and send the modified patch.
> The number of nominal fixes you showed above is not correct.
>
> Retrospective testing of checkpatch using --git history
> should be aware of changes to checkpatch.
>
> This should count only lines from 75 to 80 chars for the
> commit range you tested and only for 75 to 100 for commits
> after checkpatch changed its allowed long line maximum in
> commit bdc48fa11e46f867ea4d75fa59ee87a7f48be144
> checkpatch/coding-style: deprecate 80-column warning
>
Joe, I think this is probably true only for "WARNING:LONG_LINE".
However, here I have analyzed the count for
"WARNING:COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE".
I ran git log on these lines. Probably these lines were last changed
at 2a076f40d8c9be95bee7bcf18436655e1140447f.
I think I can change the count with exact numbers.
What do you think?
Thanks
Aditya
Powered by blists - more mailing lists