[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ceb51db5-5b7e-752a-8d0b-8bcea6aa2a5c@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 20:58:08 +0100
From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Holger Assmann <h.assmann@...gutronix.de>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Rayagond Kokatanur <rayagond@...avyalabs.com>,
kernel@...gutronix.de, Michael Olbrich <m.olbrich@...gutronix.de>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: stmmac: retain PTP-clock at hwtstamp_set
On 17.12.20 18:59, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 09:25:48 +0100 Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> On 17.12.20 02:13, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>>> + netdev_warn(priv->dev, "HW Timestamping init failed: %pe\n",
>>>> + ERR_PTR(ret));
>>>
>>> why convert to ERR_PTR and use %pe and not just %d?
>>
>> To get a symbolic error name if support is compiled in (note the `e' after %p).
>
> Cool, GTK. Kind of weird we there is no equivalent int decorator, tho.
> Do you happen to know why?
New format-specifiers should be using %p<extension>, which is already established,
said the reviewers:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200120085508.25522-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de/
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists