lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 17 Dec 2020 23:59:43 +0100
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc:     'Marek Behun' <marek.behun@....cz>,
        Abanoub Sameh <abanoubsameh8@...il.com>,
        "linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Abanoub Sameh <abanoubsameh@...tonmail.com>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: led-core: Get rid of enum led_brightness

Hi!

> > On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 03:48:40 +0200
> > Abanoub Sameh <abanoubsameh8@...il.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > This gets rid of enum led_brightness in the main led files,
> > > because it is deprecated, and an int can be used instead,
> > > or maybe even a uint8_t since it only goes up to 255.
> > > Next we can also patch the other files to get rid of it completely.
> > 
> > 1. unsigned int should be used IMO
> >   - using int may force all implementers to check for negative value
> >     and return -EINVAL, which is stupid
> >   - some LED controllers may offer more than 8bit brightness value, so
> >     no uint8_t
> 
> More than 8 bits would be good.
> While not really relevant for actual 'brightness' it allows
> for 'strange' things be encoded in the brightness field.

I have headlamp which can do 0.1lumens to 750lumens. Some go down to
0.01 lumens. More than 8 bits definitely makes sense.

Display backlights also need great ranges.

> While extra parameters could be added, they are only really usable
> by code that knows they are present.
> So encoding in the 'brightness' sort of makes sense.

No.
								Pavel
-- 
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ