linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] scsi: ufs: Cleanup and refactor clock scaling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ee0f3ffc6d86098fc5704c1726fc69f3@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:30:08 +0800
From:   Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
To:     Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
Cc:     linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        avri.altman@....com, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        beanhuo@...ron.com, asutoshd@...eaurora.org,
        matthias.bgg@...il.com, bvanassche@....org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kuohong.wang@...iatek.com, peter.wang@...iatek.com,
        chun-hung.wu@...iatek.com, andy.teng@...iatek.com,
        chaotian.jing@...iatek.com, cc.chou@...iatek.com,
        jiajie.hao@...iatek.com, alice.chao@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] scsi: ufs: Cleanup and refactor clock scaling

On 2020-12-18 14:24, Stanley Chu wrote:
> Hi Can,
> 
> On Fri, 2020-12-18 at 14:20 +0800, Can Guo wrote:
>> On 2020-12-16 21:16, Stanley Chu wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > This series cleans up and refactors clk-scaling feature, and shall not
>> > change any functionality.
>> >
>> > This series is based on Can's series "Three changes related with UFS
>> > clock scaling" in 5.10/scsi-fixes branch in Martin's tree.
>> >
>> 
>> Hi Stanley,
>> 
>> Thanks for noticing my changes, will you review them?
>> I see customers manipulte UFS scaling related sysfs
>> nodes more often than before, so we may want to fix it asap.
> 
> I have gave my review tag in all patches in this series : )
> 
> Thanks,
> Stanley Chu
> 

Hi Stanley,

oops, just saw it - I opened the wrong series.
I will push a new version which incorporates your comments soon.
Since the new changes would only be some words in ufshcd.h, so you
won't need to rebase.

Thanks,

Can Guo.

>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Can Guo.
>> 
>> > However this series may not be required to be merged to 5.10. The
>> > choice of base branch is simply making these patches easy to be
>> > reviewed because this series is based on clk-scaling fixes by Can. If
>> > this series is decided not being merged to 5.10, then I would rebase
>> > it to 5.11/scsi-queue.
>> >
>> > Changes since v1:
>> >   - Refactor ufshcd_clk_scaling_suspend() in patch [3/4]
>> >   - Change function name from ufshcd_clk_scaling_pm() to
>> > ufshcd_clk_scaling_suspend() in patch [3/4]
>> >   - Refine patch titles
>> >
>> > Stanley Chu (4):
>> >   scsi: ufs: Refactor cancelling clkscaling works
>> >   scsi: ufs: Remove redundant null checking of devfreq instance
>> >   scsi: ufs: Cleanup and refactor clk-scaling feature
>> >   scsi: ufs: Fix build warning by incorrect function description
>> >
>> >  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>> >  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)