lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:25:26 +0800
From:   kaixuxia <xiakaixu1987@...il.com>
To:     kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
        Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@...cent.com>
Cc:     "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        lkp@...ts.01.org, lkp@...el.com
Subject: Re: [xfs] 237d7887ae: xfstests.xfs.513.fail

Hi,

The patch https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-xfs/msg47389.html for xfstests
will fix this regression.

Thanks,
Kaixu

On 2020/12/18 13:58, kernel test robot wrote:
> 
> Greeting,
> 
> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-9):
> 
> commit: 237d7887ae723af7d978e8b9a385fdff416f357b ("xfs: show the proper user quota options")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/fs/xfs/xfs-linux.git xfs-5.11-merge
> 
> 
> in testcase: xfstests
> version: xfstests-x86_64-d41dcbd-1_20201215
> with following parameters:
> 
> 	disk: 4HDD
> 	fs: xfs
> 	test: xfs-group-51
> 	ucode: 0x21
> 
> test-description: xfstests is a regression test suite for xfs and other files ystems.
> test-url: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git
> 
> 
> on test machine: 4 threads Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHz with 8G memory
> 
> caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace):
> 
> 
> 
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
> 
> 2020-12-18 01:24:14 export TEST_DIR=/fs/sdb1
> 2020-12-18 01:24:14 export TEST_DEV=/dev/sdb1
> 2020-12-18 01:24:14 export FSTYP=xfs
> 2020-12-18 01:24:14 export SCRATCH_MNT=/fs/scratch
> 2020-12-18 01:24:14 mkdir /fs/scratch -p
> 2020-12-18 01:24:14 export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/sdb4
> 2020-12-18 01:24:14 export SCRATCH_LOGDEV=/dev/sdb2
> 2020-12-18 01:24:14 export SCRATCH_XFS_LIST_METADATA_FIELDS=u3.sfdir3.hdr.parent.i4
> 2020-12-18 01:24:14 export SCRATCH_XFS_LIST_FUZZ_VERBS=random
> 2020-12-18 01:24:14 sed "s:^:xfs/:" //lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/tests/xfs-group-51
> 2020-12-18 01:24:14 ./check xfs/510 xfs/511 xfs/512 xfs/513 xfs/514 xfs/515 xfs/516 xfs/517 xfs/518 xfs/519
> FSTYP         -- xfs (debug)
> PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 lkp-ivb-d05 5.10.0-rc5-00026-g237d7887ae72 #1 SMP Fri Dec 18 08:12:46 CST 2020
> MKFS_OPTIONS  -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/sdb4
> MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdb4 /fs/scratch
> 
> xfs/510	 1s
> xfs/511	 2s
> xfs/512	 2s
> xfs/513	- output mismatch (see /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//xfs/513.out.bad)
>     --- tests/xfs/513.out	2020-12-15 12:31:26.000000000 +0000
>     +++ /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//xfs/513.out.bad	2020-12-18 01:24:44.695412845 +0000
>     @@ -77,7 +77,11 @@
>      TEST: "-o usrquota" "pass" "usrquota" "true"
>      TEST: "-o quota" "pass" "usrquota" "true"
>      TEST: "-o uqnoenforce" "pass" "usrquota" "true"
>     +[FAILED]: mount /dev/loop0 /fs/sdb1/513.mnt -o uqnoenforce
>     +ERROR: did not expect to find "usrquota" in "rw,relatime,attr2,inode64,logbufs=8,logbsize=32k,uqnoenforce"
>      TEST: "-o qnoenforce" "pass" "usrquota" "true"
>     +[FAILED]: mount /dev/loop0 /fs/sdb1/513.mnt -o qnoenforce
>     ...
>     (Run 'diff -u /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/tests/xfs/513.out /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//xfs/513.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)
> xfs/514	- output mismatch (see /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//xfs/514.out.bad)
>     --- tests/xfs/514.out	2020-12-15 12:31:26.000000000 +0000
>     +++ /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//xfs/514.out.bad	2020-12-18 01:24:46.007412903 +0000
>     @@ -1,2 +1,5 @@
>      QA output created by 514
>      Silence is golden
>     +attr_remove not documented in the xfs_db manpage
>     +attr_set not documented in the xfs_db manpage
>     +logformat not documented in the xfs_db manpage
>     ...
>     (Run 'diff -u /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/tests/xfs/514.out /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//xfs/514.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)
> xfs/515	- output mismatch (see /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//xfs/515.out.bad)
>     --- tests/xfs/515.out	2020-12-15 12:31:26.000000000 +0000
>     +++ /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//xfs/515.out.bad	2020-12-18 01:24:47.082412951 +0000
>     @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
>      QA output created by 515
>      Silence is golden
>     +limit not documented in the xfs_quota manpage
>     ...
>     (Run 'diff -u /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/tests/xfs/515.out /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//xfs/515.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)
> xfs/516	 32s
> xfs/517	[not run] rmapbt not supported by scratch filesystem type: xfs
> xfs/518	 3s
> xfs/519	[not run] Reflink not supported by scratch filesystem type: xfs
> Ran: xfs/510 xfs/511 xfs/512 xfs/513 xfs/514 xfs/515 xfs/516 xfs/517 xfs/518 xfs/519
> Not run: xfs/517 xfs/519
> Failures: xfs/513 xfs/514 xfs/515
> Failed 3 of 10 tests
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To reproduce:
> 
>         git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git
>         cd lkp-tests
>         bin/lkp install job.yaml  # job file is attached in this email
>         bin/lkp run     job.yaml
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Oliver Sang
> 

-- 
kaixuxia

Powered by blists - more mailing lists