linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ACPI: PM: s2idle: More x86-specific code to the x86 directory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3f18b469-69ec-0f3a-1714-a6b5f3f314b3@amd.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:31:07 +0530
From:   Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: PM: s2idle: More x86-specific code to the x86
 directory



On 12/18/2020 12:53 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [CAUTION: External Email]
> 
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> Some code in drivers/acpi/sleep.c (which is regarded as a generic
> file) related to suspend-to-idle support has grown direct dependencies
> on x86, but in fact it has been specific to x86 (which is the only
> user of it) anyway for a long time.
> 
> For this reason, move that code to a separate file under acpi/x86/
> and make it build and run as before under the right conditions.
> 
> While at it, rename a vendor checking function in that code and
> consistently use acpi_handle_debug() for printing debug-related
> information in it.
> 
> No expected functional impact.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

Thank you Rafael.. This really helps!