lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:11:00 -0800
From:   John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To:     Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <vbabka@...e.cz>, <mhocko@...e.com>,
        <david@...hat.com>, <osalvador@...e.de>,
        <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <sashal@...nel.org>,
        <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>, <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        <mingo@...hat.com>, <jgg@...pe.ca>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
        <mgorman@...e.de>, <willy@...radead.org>, <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] selftests/vm: test flag is broken

On 12/18/20 1:06 AM, John Hubbard wrote:
>> Add a new test_flags field, to allow raw gup_flags to work.
> 
> I think .test_control_flags field would be a good name, to make it very
> clear that it's not destined for gup_flags. Just .test_flags is not quite
> as clear a distinction from .gup_flags, as .test_control_flags is, IMHO.
> 

And maybe renaming .flags to .gup_flags, just to make it really clear.


thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA

Powered by blists - more mailing lists