[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87lfdvtq4k.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 10:33:47 +0100
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
Richard Herbert <rherbert@...patico.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize not-present/MMIO SPTE check
in get_mmio_spte()
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> writes:
> Check only the terminal leaf for a "!PRESENT || MMIO" SPTE when looking
> for reserved bits on valid, non-MMIO SPTEs. The get_walk() helpers
> terminate their walks if a not-present or MMIO SPTE is encountered, i.e.
> the non-terminal SPTEs have already been verified to be regular SPTEs.
> This eliminates an extra check-and-branch in a relatively hot loop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 4798a4472066..769855f5f0a1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -3511,7 +3511,7 @@ static int get_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptes, int *root_level
> return leaf;
> }
>
> -/* return true if reserved bit is detected on spte. */
> +/* return true if reserved bit(s) are detected on a valid, non-MMIO SPTE. */
> static bool get_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptep)
> {
> u64 sptes[PT64_ROOT_MAX_LEVEL + 1];
> @@ -3534,11 +3534,20 @@ static bool get_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptep)
> return reserved;
> }
>
> + *sptep = sptes[leaf];
> +
> + /*
> + * Skip reserved bits checks on the terminal leaf if it's not a valid
> + * SPTE. Note, this also (intentionally) skips MMIO SPTEs, which, by
> + * design, always have reserved bits set. The purpose of the checks is
> + * to detect reserved bits on non-MMIO SPTEs. i.e. buggy SPTEs.
> + */
> + if (!is_shadow_present_pte(sptes[leaf]))
> + leaf++;
> +
> rsvd_check = &vcpu->arch.mmu->shadow_zero_check;
>
> - for (level = root; level >= leaf; level--) {
> - if (!is_shadow_present_pte(sptes[level]))
> - break;
> + for (level = root; level >= leaf; level--)
> /*
> * Use a bitwise-OR instead of a logical-OR to aggregate the
> * reserved bit and EPT's invalid memtype/XWR checks to avoid
> @@ -3546,7 +3555,6 @@ static bool get_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptep)
> */
> reserved |= __is_bad_mt_xwr(rsvd_check, sptes[level]) |
> __is_rsvd_bits_set(rsvd_check, sptes[level], level);
> - }
>
> if (reserved) {
> pr_err("%s: detect reserved bits on spte, addr 0x%llx, dump hierarchy:\n",
> @@ -3556,8 +3564,6 @@ static bool get_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptep)
> sptes[level], level);
> }
>
> - *sptep = sptes[leaf];
> -
> return reserved;
> }
FWIW (as I got a bit lost in tdp-mmu code when checking that
is_shadow_present_pte() is always performed)
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists