[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201218095927.GE3021@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 10:59:27 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, bp@...e.de, luto@...nel.org,
x86@...nel.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
ravi.v.shankar@...el.com, ning.sun@...el.com,
kumar.n.dwarakanath@...el.com, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/8] selftests/x86: Test Key Locker internal key
maintenance
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 09:41:44AM -0800, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> + /* ENCODEKEY128 %EAX */
> + asm volatile (".byte 0xf3, 0xf, 0x38, 0xfa, 0xc0");
This is lacking a binutils version number. Boris, didn't you do a
checkpatch.pl thing for that?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists