[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8742889a-c967-d899-ff32-f4a4ebcde7ad@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:50:15 +0800
From: Ruan Shiyang <ruansy.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>
CC: <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
<darrick.wong@...cle.com>, <david@...morbit.com>, <hch@....de>,
<song@...nel.org>, <rgoldwyn@...e.de>, <qi.fuli@...itsu.com>,
<y-goto@...itsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 8/9] md: Implement ->corrupted_range()
On 2020/12/16 下午1:43, Jane Chu wrote:
> On 12/15/2020 4:14 AM, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
>> +int bd_disk_holder_corrupted_range(struct block_device *bdev, loff_t
>> off,
>> + size_t len, void *data);
>> int bd_link_disk_holder(struct block_device *bdev, struct gendisk
>> *disk);
>> void bd_unlink_disk_holder(struct block_device *bdev, struct gendisk
>> *disk);
>> #else
>> +int bd_disk_holder_corrupted_range(struct block_device *bdev, loff_t
>> off,
>
> Did you mean
> static inline int bd_disk_holder_corrupted_range(..
> ?
Yes, it's my fault. Thanks a lot.
--
Thanks,
Ruan Shiyang.
>
> thanks,
> -jane
>
>> + size_t len, void *data)
>> +{
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> static inline int bd_link_disk_holder(struct block_device *bdev,
>> struct gendisk *disk)
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists