[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201218110021.GB14160@zn.tnic>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 12:00:21 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
"herbert@...dor.apana.org.au" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
"Sun, Ning" <ning.sun@...el.com>,
"Dwarakanath, Kumar N" <kumar.n.dwarakanath@...el.com>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 7/8] crypto: x86/aes-kl - Support AES algorithm using
Key Locker instructions
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 10:34:28AM +0000, Bae, Chang Seok wrote:
> I’m open to drop the macros if there is any better way to define them
> without binutils support.
Yap, make the driver build depend on the binutils version which supports
them.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists