| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 05:59:17 -0800
From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To: "Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@...el.com>, "Xu, Yilun" <yilun.xu@...el.com>,
"mdf@...nel.org" <mdf@...nel.org>,
"linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"lgoncalv@...hat.com" <lgoncalv@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] fpga: dfl: add the userspace I/O device support
for DFL devices
On 12/18/20 12:05 AM, Wu, Hao wrote:
>> Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] fpga: dfl: add the userspace I/O device support for
>> DFL devices
>>
>> This patch supports the DFL drivers be written in userspace. This is
>> realized by exposing the userspace I/O device interfaces.
>>
>> The driver leverages the uio_pdrv_genirq, it adds the uio_pdrv_genirq
>> platform device with the DFL device's resources, and let the generic UIO
>> platform device driver provide support to userspace access to kernel
>> interrupts and memory locations.
>>
>> The driver matches DFL devices in a different way. It has no device id
>> table, instead it matches any DFL device which could not be handled by
>> other DFL drivers.
> Looks like we want to build UIO driver as the default/generic driver for DFL,
> it seems fine but my concern is that UIO has its own limitation, if some day,
> dfl device is extended, but UIO has limitation, then we may need to select
> another one as the default driver.. or we can just match them using
> id_table as we know UIO meets the requirement for those DFL devices?
When we have multiple defaults, could this be handled in the configury ?
Tom
>
>> Signed-off-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>
>> ---
>> v2: switch to the new matching algorithem. It matches DFL devices which
>> could not be handled by other DFL drivers.
>> refacor the code about device resources filling.
>> fix some comments.
>> v3: split the dfl.c changes out of this patch.
>> some minor fixes
>> ---
>> drivers/fpga/Kconfig | 10 ++++
>> drivers/fpga/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/fpga/dfl-uio-pdev.c | 110
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 121 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/fpga/dfl-uio-pdev.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
>> index 5d7f0ae..7a88af9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
>> @@ -202,6 +202,16 @@ config FPGA_DFL_NIOS_INTEL_PAC_N3000
>> the card. It also instantiates the SPI master (spi-altera) for
>> the card's BMC (Board Management Controller).
>>
>> +config FPGA_DFL_UIO_PDEV
>> + tristate "FPGA DFL Driver for Userspace I/O platform devices"
>> + depends on FPGA_DFL && UIO_PDRV_GENIRQ
>> + help
>> + Enable this to allow some DFL drivers be written in userspace. It
>> + adds the uio_pdrv_genirq platform device with the DFL feature's
>> + resources, and lets the generic UIO platform device driver provide
>> + support for userspace access to kernel interrupts and memory
>> + locations.
> If we consider this as a default driver for everybody in DFL, then we could
> consider build it into the core, otherwise it always requires to be loaded
> manually, right?
>
>> +
>> config FPGA_DFL_PCI
>> tristate "FPGA DFL PCIe Device Driver"
>> depends on PCI && FPGA_DFL
>> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Makefile b/drivers/fpga/Makefile
>> index 18dc9885..8847fe0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/fpga/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/fpga/Makefile
>> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ dfl-afu-objs := dfl-afu-main.o dfl-afu-region.o dfl-afu-
>> dma-region.o
>> dfl-afu-objs += dfl-afu-error.o
>>
>> obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_NIOS_INTEL_PAC_N3000) += dfl-n3000-nios.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_UIO_PDEV) += dfl-uio-pdev.o
>>
>> # Drivers for FPGAs which implement DFL
>> obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_PCI) += dfl-pci.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-uio-pdev.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-uio-pdev.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..8c57233
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-uio-pdev.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * DFL driver for Userspace I/O platform devices
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Intel Corporation, Inc.
>> + */
>> +#include <linux/dfl.h>
>> +#include <linux/errno.h>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/uio_driver.h>
>> +
>> +#include "dfl.h"
>> +
>> +#define DRIVER_NAME "dfl-uio-pdev"
>> +
>> +static struct dfl_driver dfl_uio_pdev_driver;
>> +
>> +static int check_for_other_drv_match(struct device_driver *drv, void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct dfl_driver *ddrv = to_dfl_drv(drv);
>> + struct dfl_device *ddev = data;
>> +
>> + /* skip myself */
>> + if (ddrv == &dfl_uio_pdev_driver)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + return dfl_match_device(ddev, ddrv);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dfl_uio_pdev_match(struct dfl_device *ddev)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * If any other driver wants the device, leave the device to this other
>> + * driver.
>> + */
>> + if (bus_for_each_drv(&dfl_bus_type, NULL, ddev,
>> check_for_other_drv_match))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + return 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dfl_uio_pdev_probe(struct dfl_device *ddev)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = &ddev->dev;
>> + struct platform_device_info pdevinfo = { 0 };
>> + struct uio_info uio_pdata = { 0 };
>> + struct platform_device *uio_pdev;
>> + struct resource *res;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + pdevinfo.name = "uio_pdrv_genirq";
>> +
>> + res = kcalloc(ddev->num_irqs + 1, sizeof(*res), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!res)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + res[0].parent = &ddev->mmio_res;
>> + res[0].flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
>> + res[0].start = ddev->mmio_res.start;
>> + res[0].end = ddev->mmio_res.end;
>> +
>> + /* then add irq resource */
>> + for (i = 0; i < ddev->num_irqs; i++) {
>> + res[i + 1].flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ;
>> + res[i + 1].start = ddev->irqs[i];
>> + res[i + 1].end = ddev->irqs[i];
>> + }
> How many interrupts UIO could support? or we need some
> warning or just even return error here?
>
> Thanks
> Hao
>
>> +
>> + uio_pdata.name = DRIVER_NAME;
>> + uio_pdata.version = "0";
>> +
>> + pdevinfo.res = res;
>> + pdevinfo.num_res = ddev->num_irqs + 1;
>> + pdevinfo.parent = &ddev->dev;
>> + pdevinfo.id = PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO;
>> + pdevinfo.data = &uio_pdata;
>> + pdevinfo.size_data = sizeof(uio_pdata);
>> +
>> + uio_pdev = platform_device_register_full(&pdevinfo);
>> + if (!IS_ERR(uio_pdev))
>> + dev_set_drvdata(dev, uio_pdev);
>> +
>> + kfree(res);
>> +
>> + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(uio_pdev);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void dfl_uio_pdev_remove(struct dfl_device *ddev)
>> +{
>> + struct platform_device *uio_pdev = dev_get_drvdata(&ddev->dev);
>> +
>> + platform_device_unregister(uio_pdev);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct dfl_driver dfl_uio_pdev_driver = {
>> + .drv = {
>> + .name = DRIVER_NAME,
>> + },
>> + .match = dfl_uio_pdev_match,
>> + .probe = dfl_uio_pdev_probe,
>> + .remove = dfl_uio_pdev_remove,
>> +};
>> +module_dfl_driver(dfl_uio_pdev_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("DFL driver for Userspace I/O platform devices");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Intel Corporation");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>> --
>> 2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists