[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jxgbawSbYF39g857fiDCRmMACr1u-OiSWkz4M0+2UPbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 19:10:04 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] device-dax: avoid an unnecessary check in alloc_dev_dax_range()
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 1:23 AM Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> Swap the calling sequence of krealloc() and __request_region(), call the
> latter first. In this way, the value of dev_dax->nr_range does not need to
> be considered when __request_region() failed.
This looks ok, but I think I want to see another cleanup go in first
before this to add a helper for trimming the last range off the set of
ranges:
static void dev_dax_trim_range(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
{
int i = dev_dax->nr_range - 1;
struct range *range = &dev_dax->ranges[i].range;
struct dax_region *dax_region = dev_dax->region;
dev_dbg(dev, "delete range[%d]: %#llx:%#llx\n", i,
(unsigned long long)range->start,
(unsigned long long)range->end);
__release_region(&dax_region->res, range->start, range_len(range));
if (--dev_dax->nr_range == 0) {
kfree(dev_dax->ranges);
dev_dax->ranges = NULL;
}
}
Care to do a lead in patch with that cleanup, then do this one?
I think that might also cleanup a memory leak report from Jane in
addition to not needing the "goto" as well.
http://lore.kernel.org/r/c8a8a260-34c6-dbfc-1f19-25c23d01cb45@oracle.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists