[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aad56a6f5af539b1dc39d3e75ef83bc3@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 20:53:53 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [irqchip: irq/irqchip-next] irqchip/bcm2836: Fix IPI
acknowledgement after conversion to handle_percpu_devid_irq
On 2020-12-18 20:36, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 18/12/20 18:40, irqchip-bot for Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> The following commit has been merged into the irq/irqchip-next branch
>> of irqchip:
>>
>> Commit-ID: d7f39c40ebb6986e7371510d1c20a4efee4a7f0d
>> Gitweb:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms/d7f39c40ebb6986e7371510d1c20a4efee4a7f0d
>> Author: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
>> AuthorDate: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 18:03:46
>> Committer: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
>> CommitterDate: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 18:34:17
>>
>> irqchip/bcm2836: Fix IPI acknowledgement after conversion to
>> handle_percpu_devid_irq
>>
>> It appears that despite its name, the bcm2836_arm_irqchip_ipi_eoi()
>> callback is an acknowledgement, and not an EOI. This means that
>> we lose IPIs that are made pending between the handling of the
>> IPI and the write to LOCAL_MAILBOX0_CLR0. With the right timing,
>> things fail nicely.
>>
>> This used to work with handle_percpu_devid_fasteoi_ipi(), which
>> started by eoi-ing the interrupt. With the standard fasteoi flow,
>> this doesn't work anymore.
>>
>> So let's use this callback for what it is, an ack. Your favourite
>> RPi-2/3 is back up and running.
>>
>
> Thanks for cleaning up my mess!
Shared responsibilities... ;-)
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists