linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] Bluetooth: Keep MSFT ext info throughout a hci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 18 Dec 2020 22:39:22 +0100
From:   Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To:     Miao-chen Chou <mcchou@...omium.org>
Cc:     Bluetooth Kernel Mailing List <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alain Michaud <alainm@...omium.org>,
        Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@...el.com>,
        Archie Pusaka <apusaka@...omium.org>,
        Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@...omium.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] Bluetooth: Keep MSFT ext info throughout a
 hci_dev's life cycle

Hi Miao-chen,

> This moves msft_do_close() from hci_dev_do_close() to
> hci_unregister_dev() to avoid clearing MSFT extension info. This also
> avoids retrieving MSFT info upon every msft_do_open() if MSFT extension
> has been initialized.

what is the actual benefit of this?

It is fundamentally one extra HCI command and that one does no harm. You are trying to outsmart the hdev->setup vs the !hdev->setup case. I don’t think this is a good idea.

So unless I see a real argument why we want to do this, I am leaving this patch out. And on a side note, I named these function exactly this way so they are symmetric with hci_dev_do_{open,close}.

Regards

Marcel