linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] software_node: Add support for fwnode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 18 Dec 2020 23:46:34 +0000
From:   Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
To:     Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devel@...ica.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        lenb@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, yong.zhi@...el.com,
        sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com, bingbu.cao@...el.com,
        tian.shu.qiu@...el.com, mchehab@...nel.org, robert.moore@...el.com,
        erik.kaneda@...el.com, pmladek@...e.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
        linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
        laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com,
        jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org, kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
        kitakar@...il.com, jorhand@...ux.microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] software_node: Add support for fwnode_graph*()
 family of functions


On 18/12/2020 22:13, Daniel Scally wrote:

>>> +			break;
>>> +		}
>>> +
>>> +		/* No more endpoints for that port, so stop passing old */
>>> +		old = NULL;
>>
>> I wonder if you could drop the 'old' variable and use 'enpoint' in the
>> call to software_node_get_next_child(). You could then drop these two
>> lines.
> 
> That won't work, because endpoint would at that point not be a child of
> the port we're passing, and the function relies on it being one:
> 
> 	if (!p || list_empty(&p->children) ||
> 	    (c && list_is_last(&c->entry, &p->children))) {
> 		fwnode_handle_put(child);
> 		return NULL;
> 	}
> 

Wait, that's nonsense of course, because endpoint gets set to NULL when
software_node_get_next_child() finds nothing - I'll double check but
pretty sure you're right.