[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201219233111.GF3008889@lunn.ch>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 00:31:11 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@...rochip.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
Bjarni Jonasson <bjarni.jonasson@...rochip.com>,
Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....nxp.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Mark Einon <mark.einon@...il.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] net: sparx5: add ethtool configuration and
statistics support
> +void sparx5_get_stats64(struct net_device *ndev,
> + struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats)
> +{
> + struct sparx5_port *port = netdev_priv(ndev);
> + struct sparx5 *sparx5 = port->sparx5;
> + u64 *portstats;
> +
> + if (!sparx5->stats)
> + return; /* Not initialized yet */
> +
> + portstats = &sparx5->stats[port->portno * sparx5->num_stats];
> +
> + mutex_lock(&sparx5->stats_lock);
There was a big discussion about stats64 not being able to take a lock
a few weeks ago. You probably want to go read the thread. The aim was
to allow sleeping, but i don't know if that as been achieved yet.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists