linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] m68k: Enable seccomp architecture tracking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUY5OY2s63AJE-EUVLGTM_z9st3iupQv_pWTt84tvN1hQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 20 Dec 2020 15:28:17 +0100
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc:     linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
        YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@...inois.edu>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: Enable seccomp architecture tracking

Hi Adrian,

On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 12:24 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
<glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> On 12/20/20 9:51 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > To enable seccomp constant action bitmaps, we need to have a static
> > mapping to the audit architecture and system call table size.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> > ---
> > Needed for CONFIG_SECCOMP_CACHE_DEBUG.
> > Note that upstream doesn't have m68k seccomp support yet.
>
> Have we added SECCOMP support for m68k to the kernel yet?

No, but I have applied locally the patches floating on the list...

> It's actually something I was hoping to do over the holidays ;-).

Happy to hear that!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds