linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] dt-bindings: clk: mstar msc313 mpll binding description

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <160848984935.1580929.936824086681978646@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Sun, 20 Dec 2020 10:44:09 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>
Cc:     DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] dt-bindings: clk: mstar msc313 mpll binding description

Quoting Daniel Palmer (2020-12-19 22:35:41)
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 12:39, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > +  clock-output-names:
> > > +    minItems: 8
> > > +    maxItems: 8
> > > +    description: |
> > > +      This should provide a name for the internal PLL clock and then
> > > +      a name for each of the divided outputs.
> >
> > Is this necessary?
> 
> I found without the names specified in the dt probing of muxes that
> depend on the outputs but appear earlier didn't work.
> Also this same PLL layout seems to be used in some other places so
> eventually I was thinking this driver would get used for those PLLs
> with different output names.

Still seems like it could be auto-generated based on dev_name() +
number. Now that we have a way to specify clk parents via the clocks
property in DT (without any clock-names required) we should be able to
avoid needing clock-output-names in general.