lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 20 Dec 2020 12:43:07 +0530
From:   Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokatanur@...adcom.com>
To:     Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Dhananjay Phadke <dphadke@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lori Hikichi <lori.hikichi@...adcom.com>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] i2c: iproc: handle master read request

On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 12:41 AM Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/16/2020 8:08 PM, Rayagonda Kokatanur wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 11:14 PM Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/2/2020 6:35 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> All review comments are scattered now, please let me know what has to be
> >>>> done further,
> >>>> Are we going to change the tasklet to irq thread ?
> >>>> Are we going to remove batching 64 packets if transaction > 64B and use rx
> >>>> fifo threshold ?
> >>>>
> >>>> I don't see any issue with current code but if it has to change we need a
> >>>> valid reason for the same.
> >>>> If nothing to be done, please acknowledge the patch.
> >>>
> >>> Valid request. Has there been any news?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Sorry for the delay. I just replied.
> >
> > This patch is tested and validated with all corner cases and its working.
> > Can we merge this and take up any improvement as part of separate patch?
> >
>
> I think that makes sense, and I'm okay with these patches going in as
> they are now.
>
> Acked-by: Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>

Thank you.

>
> But please help to collect precise FIFO access timing (later when you
> have time), that would allow us to know if the current defer-to-tasklet
> (instead of thread) based approach makes sense or not.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ray
>
> > Thanks,
> > Rayagonda
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Ray

-- 
This electronic communication and the information and any files transmitted 
with it, or attached to it, are confidential and are intended solely for 
the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain 
information that is confidential, legally privileged, protected by privacy 
laws, or otherwise restricted from disclosure to anyone else. If you are 
not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the 
e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, 
copying, distributing, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of 
this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, 
please return the e-mail to the sender, delete it from your computer, and 
destroy any printed copy of it.

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4187 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists