[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c89ecac6-f5bb-52b8-4fcd-9098983cdf2e@molgen.mpg.de>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:22:11 +0100
From: Donald Buczek <buczek@...gen.mpg.de>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
it+linux-xfs@...gen.mpg.de
Subject: Re: v5.10.1 xfs deadlock
On 18.12.20 22:49, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 06:44:51PM +0100, Donald Buczek wrote:
>> Dear xfs developer,
>>
>> I was doing some testing on a Linux 5.10.1 system with two 100 TB xfs filesystems on md raid6 raids.
>>
>> The stress test was essentially `cp -a`ing a Linux source repository with two threads in parallel on each filesystem.
>>
>> After about on hour, the processes to one filesystem (md1) blocked, 30 minutes later the process to the other filesystem (md0) did.
>>
>> root 7322 2167 0 Dec16 pts/1 00:00:06 cp -a /jbod/M8068/scratch/linux /jbod/M8068/scratch/1/linux.018.TMP
>> root 7329 2169 0 Dec16 pts/1 00:00:05 cp -a /jbod/M8068/scratch/linux /jbod/M8068/scratch/2/linux.019.TMP
>> root 13856 2170 0 Dec16 pts/1 00:00:08 cp -a /jbod/M8067/scratch/linux /jbod/M8067/scratch/2/linux.028.TMP
>> root 13899 2168 0 Dec16 pts/1 00:00:05 cp -a /jbod/M8067/scratch/linux /jbod/M8067/scratch/1/linux.027.TMP
>>
>> Some info from the system (all stack traces, slabinfo) is available here: https://owww.molgen.mpg.de/~buczek/2020-12-16.info.txt
>>
>> It stands out, that there are many (549 for md0, but only 10 for md1) "xfs-conv" threads all with stacks like this
>>
>> [<0>] xfs_log_commit_cil+0x6cc/0x7c0
>> [<0>] __xfs_trans_commit+0xab/0x320
>> [<0>] xfs_iomap_write_unwritten+0xcb/0x2e0
>> [<0>] xfs_end_ioend+0xc6/0x110
>> [<0>] xfs_end_io+0xad/0xe0
>> [<0>] process_one_work+0x1dd/0x3e0
>> [<0>] worker_thread+0x2d/0x3b0
>> [<0>] kthread+0x118/0x130
>> [<0>] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
>>
>> xfs_log_commit_cil+0x6cc is
>>
>> xfs_log_commit_cil()
>> xlog_cil_push_background(log)
>> xlog_wait(&cil->xc_push_wait, &cil->xc_push_lock);
>>
>> Some other threads, including the four "cp" commands are also blocking at xfs_log_commit_cil+0x6cc
>>
>> There are also single "flush" process for each md device with this stack signature:
>>
>> [<0>] xfs_map_blocks+0xbf/0x400
>> [<0>] iomap_do_writepage+0x15e/0x880
>> [<0>] write_cache_pages+0x175/0x3f0
>> [<0>] iomap_writepages+0x1c/0x40
>> [<0>] xfs_vm_writepages+0x59/0x80
>> [<0>] do_writepages+0x4b/0xe0
>> [<0>] __writeback_single_inode+0x42/0x300
>> [<0>] writeback_sb_inodes+0x198/0x3f0
>> [<0>] __writeback_inodes_wb+0x5e/0xc0
>> [<0>] wb_writeback+0x246/0x2d0
>> [<0>] wb_workfn+0x26e/0x490
>> [<0>] process_one_work+0x1dd/0x3e0
>> [<0>] worker_thread+0x2d/0x3b0
>> [<0>] kthread+0x118/0x130
>> [<0>] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
>>
>> xfs_map_blocks+0xbf is the
>>
>> xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED);
>>
>> in xfs_map_blocks().
>
> Can you post the entire dmesg output after running
> 'echo w > /proc/sysrq-trigger' to dump all the block threads to
> dmesg?
>
>> I have an out of tree driver for the HBA ( smartpqi 2.1.6-005
>> pulled from linux-scsi) , but it is unlikely that this blocking is
>> related to that, because the md block devices itself are
>> responsive (`xxd /dev/md0` )
>
> My bet is that the OOT driver/hardware had dropped a log IO on the
> floor - XFS is waiting for the CIL push to complete, and I'm betting
> that is stuck waiting for iclog IO completion while writing the CIL
> to the journal. The sysrq output will tell us if this is the case,
> so that's the first place to look.
I think you are right here, and I'm sorry for blaming the wrong layer.
I've got the system into another (though little different) zero-progress situation. This time it happened on md0 only while md1 was still working.
I think, this should be prove, that the failure is on the block layer of the member disks:
root:deadbird:/scratch/local/# for f in /sys/devices/virtual/block/md?/md/rd*/block/inflight;do echo $f: $(cat $f);done
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd0/block/inflight: 1 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd1/block/inflight: 1 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd10/block/inflight: 1 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd11/block/inflight: 1 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd12/block/inflight: 1 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd13/block/inflight: 1 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd14/block/inflight: 1 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd15/block/inflight: 1 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd2/block/inflight: 1 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd3/block/inflight: 1 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd4/block/inflight: 1 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd5/block/inflight: 1 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd6/block/inflight: 1 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd7/block/inflight: 1 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd8/block/inflight: 1 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd9/block/inflight: 1 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd0/block/inflight: 0 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd1/block/inflight: 0 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd10/block/inflight: 0 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd11/block/inflight: 0 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd12/block/inflight: 0 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd13/block/inflight: 0 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd14/block/inflight: 0 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd15/block/inflight: 0 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd2/block/inflight: 0 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd3/block/inflight: 0 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd4/block/inflight: 0 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd5/block/inflight: 0 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd6/block/inflight: 0 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd7/block/inflight: 0 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd8/block/inflight: 0 0
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd9/block/inflight: 0 0
Best
Donald
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
>
--
Donald Buczek
buczek@...gen.mpg.de
Tel: +49 30 8413 1433
Powered by blists - more mailing lists