lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQ9vhB6iYHeGV3xcyo8_iLqmGJeJUYOvbdHqN9Wn0mEJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Dec 2020 00:59:08 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: lantiq_etop: check the result of request_irq()

On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 12:26 AM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 02:43:23PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > The declaration of request_irq() in <linux/interrupt.h> is marked as
> > __must_check.
> >
> > Without the return value check, I see the following warnings:
> >
> > drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_etop.c: In function 'ltq_etop_hw_init':
> > drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_etop.c:273:4: warning: ignoring return value of 'request_irq', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
> >   273 |    request_irq(irq, ltq_etop_dma_irq, 0, "etop_tx", priv);
> >       |    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_etop.c:281:4: warning: ignoring return value of 'request_irq', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
> >   281 |    request_irq(irq, ltq_etop_dma_irq, 0, "etop_rx", priv);
> >       |    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Reported-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_etop.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_etop.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_etop.c
> > index 2d0c52f7106b..960494f9752b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_etop.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_etop.c
> > @@ -264,13 +264,18 @@ ltq_etop_hw_init(struct net_device *dev)
> >       for (i = 0; i < MAX_DMA_CHAN; i++) {
> >               int irq = LTQ_DMA_CH0_INT + i;
> >               struct ltq_etop_chan *ch = &priv->ch[i];
> > +             int ret;
> >
> >               ch->idx = ch->dma.nr = i;
> >               ch->dma.dev = &priv->pdev->dev;
> >
> >               if (IS_TX(i)) {
> >                       ltq_dma_alloc_tx(&ch->dma);
> > -                     request_irq(irq, ltq_etop_dma_irq, 0, "etop_tx", priv);
> > +                     ret = request_irq(irq, ltq_etop_dma_irq, 0, "etop_tx", priv);
> > +                     if (ret) {
> > +                             netdev_err(dev, "failed to request irq\n");
> > +                             return ret;
>
> You need to cleanup what ltq_dma_alloc_tx() did.


Any failure from this function will roll back
in the following paths:

  ltq_etop_hw_exit()
     -> ltq_etop_free_channel()
          -> ltq_dma_free()


So, dma is freed anyway.

One problem I see is,
ltq_etop_hw_exit() frees all DMA channels,
some of which may not have been allocated yet.

If it is a bug, it is an existing bug.


>
> > +                     }
> >               } else if (IS_RX(i)) {
> >                       ltq_dma_alloc_rx(&ch->dma);
> >                       for (ch->dma.desc = 0; ch->dma.desc < LTQ_DESC_NUM;
> > @@ -278,7 +283,11 @@ ltq_etop_hw_init(struct net_device *dev)
> >                               if (ltq_etop_alloc_skb(ch))
> >                                       return -ENOMEM;


This -ENOMEM does not roll back anything here.

As stated above, dma_free_coherent() is called.
The problem is, ltq_etop_hw_exit() rolls back too much.

If your requirement is "this driver is completely wrong. Please rewrite it",
sorry, I cannot (unless I am paid to do so).

I am just following this driver's roll-back model.

Please do not expect more to a person who
volunteers to eliminate build warnings.

Of course, if somebody volunteers to rewrite this driver correctly,
that is appreciated.



> >                       ch->dma.desc = 0;
> > -                     request_irq(irq, ltq_etop_dma_irq, 0, "etop_rx", priv);
> > +                     ret = request_irq(irq, ltq_etop_dma_irq, 0, "etop_rx", priv);
> > +                     if (ret) {
> > +                             netdev_err(dev, "failed to request irq\n");
> > +                             return ret;
>
> And here you need to cleanup ltq_dma_alloc_rx().
>
>     Andrew



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ