linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] futex: mark futex_detect

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJF2gTSc5FS-iUZUiEygviFwa17e=iBncmL+mZ_BORbSthmxiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Dec 2020 10:58:38 +0800
From:   Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
        sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] futex: mark futex_detect_cmpxchg() as 'noinline'

Hi Arnd,

On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 1:49 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 4:46 PM Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 7:26 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 7:09 AM Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 9:15 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > > I had a look at what other architectures always implement
> > > > > futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() or can use the asm-generic non-SMP version,
> > > > > and I found that it's pretty much all of them, the odd ones being just sparc32
> > > > > and csky, which use asm-generic/futex.h but do have an SMP option,
> > > > > as well as xtensa
> > > > >
> > > > > I would guess that for csky, this is a mistake, as the architecture is fairly
> > > > > new and should be able to implement it. Not sure about sparc32.
> > > >
> > > > The c610, c807, c810 don't support SMP, so futex_cmpxchg_enabled = 1
> > > > with asm-generic's implementation.
> > > > For c860, there is no HAVE_FUTEX_CMPXCHG and cmpxchg_inatomic/inuser
> > > > implementation, so futex_cmpxchg_enabled = 0.
> > > >
> > > > Thx for point it out, we'll implement cmpxchg_inatomic/inuser for C860
> > > > and still use asm-generic for non-smp CPUs.
> > >
> > > Sounds good to me.
> > Done: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/1608478763-60148-3-git-send-email-guoren@kernel.org/T/#u
>
> Thanks!
>
> Can you clarify if there are any dependencies on the other patches in
> that series?
No dependency.

>
> I'd like to take the futex patch through the asm-generic tree along with the
> patches for the other architectures.
You take the futex patch and I'll remove it from my tree.

-- 
Best Regards
 Guo Ren

ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/