linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/11] scsi: libsas: event notifiers: Remove non

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 21 Dec 2020 18:38:13 +0100
From:   "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>
To:     John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc:     "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>,
        Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>,
        Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@...el.com>,
        Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Sebastian A. Siewior" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] scsi: libsas: event notifiers: Remove non _gfp()
 variants

On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 05:17:13PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> On 18/12/2020 20:43, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> > All call-sites of below libsas APIs:
> >
> >    - sas_alloc_event()
> >    - sas_ha_struct::notify_port_event()
> >    - sas_ha_struct::notify_phy_event()
> >
> > have been converted to use the new _gfp()-suffixed version.
> >
>
> nit: Is it possible to have non- _gfp()-suffixed symbols at the end, i.e.
> have same as original?
>

Yes, of course. I just did not want to double-fold the patch series size
from first submission ;-)

If the overall outlook of this series is OK, in v2 I'll append patches
#12 => #20 restoring call sites to the original names without _gfp(),
then keep only the original libsas names.

Thanks,

--
Ahmed S. Darwish
Linutronix GmbH