[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201221173812.GA2165279@debian-buster-darwi.lab.linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 18:38:13 +0100
From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>,
Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>,
Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@...el.com>,
Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Sebastian A. Siewior" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] scsi: libsas: event notifiers: Remove non _gfp()
variants
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 05:17:13PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> On 18/12/2020 20:43, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> > All call-sites of below libsas APIs:
> >
> > - sas_alloc_event()
> > - sas_ha_struct::notify_port_event()
> > - sas_ha_struct::notify_phy_event()
> >
> > have been converted to use the new _gfp()-suffixed version.
> >
>
> nit: Is it possible to have non- _gfp()-suffixed symbols at the end, i.e.
> have same as original?
>
Yes, of course. I just did not want to double-fold the patch series size
from first submission ;-)
If the overall outlook of this series is OK, in v2 I'll append patches
#12 => #20 restoring call sites to the original names without _gfp(),
then keep only the original libsas names.
Thanks,
--
Ahmed S. Darwish
Linutronix GmbH
Powered by blists - more mailing lists